<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">MR</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Magnetic Resonance</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">MR</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Magn. Reson.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2699-0016</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/mr-4-115-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Time-domain proton-detected local-field NMR for molecular structure determination in complex<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> lipid membranes</article-title><alt-title>R-proton-detected local-field NMR including radiofrequency field inhomogeneity</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{R-proton-detected local-field NMR including radiofrequency field inhomogeneity}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Wurl et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Wurl</surname><given-names>Anika</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6785-9296</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Saalwächter</surname><given-names>Kay</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-4770</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Mendes Ferreira</surname><given-names>Tiago</given-names></name>
          <email>tiago.ferreira@physik.uni-halle.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0312-1479</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>NMR group, Institute for Physics, Martin Luther University Halle–Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Tiago Mendes Ferreira (tiago.ferreira@physik.uni-halle.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>May</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>115</fpage><lpage>127</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>November</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>April</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>April</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Anika Wurl et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023.html">This article is available from https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e98">Proton-detected local-field (PDLF) NMR spectroscopy, using magic-angle spinning and dipolar recoupling, is presently the most powerful experimental technique for obtaining atomistic structural information from small molecules undergoing anisotropic motion. Common examples include peptides, drugs, or lipids in model membranes and molecules that form liquid crystals. The measurements on complex systems are however compromised by the larger number of transients required. Retaining sufficient spectral quality in the direct dimension requires that the indirect time-domain modulation becomes too short for yielding dipolar splittings in the frequency domain. In such cases, the dipolar couplings can be obtained by fitting the experimental data; however ideal models often fail to fit PDLF data properly due to effects of radiofrequency field (RF) spatial inhomogeneity. Here, we demonstrate that by accounting for RF spatial inhomogeneity in the modeling of R-symmetry-based PDLF NMR experiments, the fitting accuracy is improved, facilitating the analysis of the experimental data. In comparison to the analysis of dipolar splittings without any fitting procedure, the accurate modeling of PDLF measurements makes possible three important improvements: the use of shorter experiments that enable the investigation of samples with a higher level of complexity, the measurement of C–H bond order parameters with smaller magnitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and of smaller variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> caused by perturbations of the system, and the determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values with small differences from distinct sites having the same chemical shift. The increase in fitting accuracy is demonstrated by comparison with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR quadrupolar echo experiments on mixtures of deuterated and non-deuterated dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) and with 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (POPE) membranes. Accurate modeling of PDLF NMR experiments is highly useful for investigating complex membrane systems. This is exemplified by application of the proposed fitting procedure for the characterization of membranes composed of a brain lipid extract with many distinct lipid types.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding-source>
<award-id>project number 189853844, TRR 102</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e174">The methodology for characterizing molecular structure in biological systems has been advancing rapidly over recent years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.1"/>. Among the various experimental techniques available, solid-state NMR spectroscopy provides the most powerful methods for investigating the molecular structure of smaller molecules (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 kDa) undergoing anisotropic motion in membranes such as lipids, peptides, and membrane proteins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e190">Of these techniques, researchers have consistently used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR spectroscopy since the 1970s for the molecular structural characterization of both lipids and peptides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.3"/>.
The popularity of this method is due to both its simplicity and the high accuracy of the experiments. However, it requires specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H isotopic labeling for site resolution. This requirement severely limits its application to<?pagebreak page116?> the investigation of biological extracts or complex model membranes that mimic biological systems.
Alternatives to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR are separated local-field (SLF) 2D NMR experiments that make use of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C heteronuclear dipolar recoupling during the indirect time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.4"/>. This technique is very advantageous compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR because SLF delivers the same type of information with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C chemical shift selectivity and does not require isotopic labeling. These SLF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C heteronuclear dipolar recoupling NMR techniques fall into two groups, carbon-detected local-field (CDLF) and proton-detected local-field (PDLF) experiments, with the latter having enhanced resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.5"/>. Here, we discuss only PDLF techniques which provide C–H bond site resolution and are therefore directly comparable to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR.</p>
      <p id="d1e294">A number of PDLF pulse sequences have been implemented to investigate lipid membranes and other systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.6"/>. The main difference between the distinct PDLF sequences reported are the heteronuclear dipolar recoupling blocks used to counteract the effect of magic-angle spinning (MAS) on the anisotropic Hamiltonian terms during the indirect dimension. Several recoupling pulse sequences have been designed for this purpose such as REDOR <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.7"/>, DROSS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.8"/>, R-symmetry-based pulse sequences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.9"/>, and others <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.10"/>. In recent years, an R-symmetry-based PDLF sequence designed by Dvinskikh and coworkers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.11"/>, dubbed R-PDLF (incorporating R18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recoupling blocks), has been frequently used to successfully investigate lipid membranes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.12"/>. The R-symmetry sequences are particularly advantageous, since they enable one to simultaneously recouple the heteronuclear and decouple the homonuclear dipolar interactions. Moreover, R-symmetry recoupling can be applied directly to an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spin ensemble in thermal equilibrium with no need of generating transverse magnetization before the recoupling blocks and therefore avoiding potential <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> losses during the recoupling period, i.e., increasing sensitivity. It is well-known that, as with other dipolar recoupling pulse sequences, R-symmetry recoupling is rather sensitive to radiofrequency field (RF) imperfections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.13"/> and therefore to the RF spatial inhomogeneity across the sample investigated – one unavoidable and unique feature of the MAS probe used to perform experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.14"/>. To minimize this problem, windowed R-symmetry sequences have been proposed that are not as sensitive to RF inhomogeneity as the original windowless R-symmetry sequences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.15"/>. These windowed versions, however, require using higher RFs which is a practical bottleneck due to hardware limitations.</p>
      <p id="d1e362">In general, the strategy for developing better dipolar recoupling methods has been to minimize the sensitivity to RF spatial inhomogeneity, by using/designing dipolar recoupling sequences that are less sensitive to RF imperfections and reducing the sample studied to a narrow volume, and using recoupling pulse sequences with a high scaling factor that enable the measurement of smaller dipolar couplings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.16"/>. This last point is of significant importance, as higher scaling factors make it possible to obtain dipolar splittings in the indirect frequency domain with a reduced maximum time in the indirect dimension.</p>
      <p id="d1e369">PDLF experiments have been mostly analyzed by “reading off” the dipolar splittings obtained in the indirect frequency domain of the 2D spectra. In contrast to the standard analysis of REDOR or DIPSHIFT dipolar evolutions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.17"/>, PDLF measurements have been rarely analyzed by employing fitting procedures. The few time-domain (TD) analysis attempts reported assumed samples under a homogeneous RF field <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.18"/>; however, it is well-known that dipolar recoupling sequences are highly sensitive to RF inhomogeneity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.19"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e381">Here, we present an analysis procedure that enables one to increase the accuracy and applicability of R-symmetry-based PDLF NMR (R-PDLF) through R-PDLF numerical simulations that take into account the RF spatial inhomogeneity of the probe used explicitly, i.e., rather than trying to minimize the effect of RF spatial inhomogeneity, we include it in the NMR simulations used to fit the experimental measurements. The use of RF inhomogeneity for data analysis has been done recently for investigating protein molecular structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.20"/>. Here we apply this strategy to analyze R-PDLF experiments that were proven suitable to investigate molecular structure in lipid membranes. The novelty of the procedure presented is solely in the analysis of the experimental data, no special hardware or different setup of the experiment is required. We tested the methodology on a DMPC/DMPCd sample to allow comparison of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C dipolar couplings determined by a R<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-type PDLF sequence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.21"/> with the C–D bond order parameters determined from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H quadrupolar couplings. We then implemented such an analysis procedure to investigate a system of complex lipid membranes composed of a brain lipid extract. This enabled us to measure several dipolar couplings from the membrane hydrophilic layer composed of many types of distinct phospholipid headgroups. We believe that this strategy is highly useful for investigating both model systems and complex membrane systems with a low signal-to-noise ratio such as biological lipid extracts. In addition it has the potential for investigating in-cell molecular structures.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page117?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodological framework</title>
      <p id="d1e439">The typical approach for determining C–H bond order parameter magnitudes with PDLF dipolar recoupling NMR is by performing a Fourier transform,
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M24" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        of the time-domain recoupled dipolar modulation over the indirect dimension, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and reading-off the splitting(s) of the resulting spectral dipolar line shape <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.22"/>. If the scaling factor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the particular pulse sequence under use is known, determining the magnitude of a C–H bond order parameter from the splitting(s) observed is straightforward by using
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">|</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">〈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">〉</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the magnitude of the rigid dipolar coupling for a static C–H bond equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 kHz, the angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is between the C–H bond and the symmetry axis of its uniaxial motion (in case of lipid membranes, this is the bilayer normal), and the angular brackets denote a time average over a time interval up to approximately the inverse of the splitting measured.</p>
      <p id="d1e635">For a dipolar modulation corresponding to a single C–H bond order parameter and acquired under optimal experimental conditions, the use of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) allows accurate values to be obtained provided that the digitized signal, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, extends to a time longer than the reciprocal of the scaled dipolar coupling frequency (e.g., four times the reciprocal gives approximately 10 % error). If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is instead a superposition of two distinct contributions with different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for resolving the two components in the spectrum, the signal acquisition must be, at least, longer than half of a beat period defined by the frequencies of the crystallite orientations responsible for the two splittings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.23"/>. This is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> for a superposition of two Pake patterns. Therefore, both for single-component dipolar modulations with low order parameters and for two-component dipolar modulations with a small frequency difference between the two components, a large number of indirect dimension points is needed in 2D dipolar recoupling experiments which severely increases the experimental time. Such a requisite is especially difficult to achieve for samples that require acquisition of a large number of transients in the direct dimension. Moreover, there is a maximum limit to the number of indirect dimension points acquired both due to RF heating of samples and to maintain the integrity of the NMR probe.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e693">The effect of using a limited number of time-domain points to describe a superposition of two Pake patterns with distinct splittings. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e705">Numerical simulations of the R-PDLF pulse sequence for a fixed dipolar coupling displaying the effects of RF nutation frequency deviation from ideal settings <bold>(a)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H chemical shift offset <bold>(b)</bold> given in parts per million units. The solid red and faint red curves correspond to the dipolar modulation with ideal settings which yield a dipolar splitting equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.315</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Negative and positive chemical offset shifts with the same magnitude have exactly the same effect. All simulations in this work were performed for a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H Larmor frequency of 400 MHz.
 </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e756"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Analyzing the measured data with a fitting model (in either the time or frequency domains) can be used to circumvent the limitations outlined above. The practical bottleneck for such an analysis is the RF inhomogeneity across the sample, intrinsic to the majority of experimental setups <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.24"/>, combined with the sensitivity of recoupling pulse sequences to RF strength accuracy and the effect of chemical shift offsets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.25"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> illustrates such dependencies for the R-PDLF pulse sequence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.26"/>, showing a non-linear dependence of the dipolar modulation on the RF pulse power level deviation from the ideal value and on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H chemical shift offset. The effect of RF miscalibration becomes rather pronounced at RF frequencies higher or lower than 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the ideal frequency. This means that in typical experiments, for which the  RF spatial inhomogeneity profile may reach 80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the maximum value in the outer parts of the sample <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.27"/>, one should expect deviations from the ideal dipolar lineshape. The effect of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H chemical shift offset is almost negligible up to 4 ppm above which large deviations from the ideal behavior occur. For achieving optimal resolution in an R-PDLF experiment, the chemical shift offset should therefore be no more than 4 ppm at a magnetic field inducing a Larmor frequency for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H equal to 400 MHz.</p>
      <p id="d1e820">The outcome of an experiment is always the sum over all the detectable spatially distributed sample volumes.<?pagebreak page118?> Therefore, the experimental data measured with an R-PDLF experiment are a sum over dipolar modulations, each modulation with a characteristic lineshape that depends on the local RF field. To simulate realistic R-PDLF experiments accounting for RF inhomogeneity, we first measured the RF inhomogeneity in the probe used in this work by the method suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.28"/> (details given in the Supplement). The simulation data were then generated by integrating over R-PDLF NMR simulations that covered the RF spatial inhomogeneity measured. This was done by composing a MATLAB script with SIMPSON call-outs enabling to build an R-PDLF simulation database with realistic modulations for a range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The database generated included the effect of chemical shift offsets and RF miscalibration with or without a built-in RF spatial inhomogeneity profile.  The MATLAB/SIMPSON files and the NMR database generated are available as open data (<uri>https://github.com/tfmFerreira/inhomogeneous-rf-nmr.git</uri>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e842">Simulation of the effect of RF spatial inhomogeneity on R-PDLF dipolar modulation and illustration of the advantage of time-domain analysis of the data over reading-off the dipolar splitting(s) in the frequency domain. <bold>(a)</bold> R-PDLF pulse sequence used in this work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.29"/>. <bold>(b)</bold> Ideal R-PDLF dipolar modulation with two components having C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>H bond order parameters equal to 0.03 and 0.04 (gray lines display the individual components used). In the frequency domain, the two splittings cannot be distinguished, due to the limited number of points used in the time domain.  <bold>(c)</bold> The same as in <bold>(b)</bold> but including the effect of RF spatial inhomogeneity taken as a Gaussian distribution that reflects the RF inhomogeneity of the coil used in this work (details in the SI). <bold>(d)</bold> Simulation of an experimental result with low signal-to-noise ratio by addition of random noise to the simulated curve in <bold>(c)</bold>. On the bottom plot, the curves show the result of fitting the data with two components using numerical simulations performed with ideal settings (red) and by accounting for the RF spatial inhomogeneity profile (blue).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e880">The result of accounting for RF inhomogeneity in the R-PDLF simulations is exemplified in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for a two-component dipolar modulation, consisting of two distinct C–H bond order parameters of 0.03 and 0.04. The main effect of including RF spatial inhomogeneity in the simulation is the damping of the signal and the non-zero long time average of the modulation which gives rise to a middle peak in the dipolar spectrum as also reported previously by Polenova and coworkers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.30"/>.
Due to the limited number of points used, the distinct dipolar couplings are not visible in either dipolar spectrum of the two simulations. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d shows the result of adding random noise to the simulated data in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c and fitting the data either with an ideal model or by taking the RF spatial inhomogeneity into account. The fit performed with NMR simulations having ideal settings gave values of 0.034 and 0.094, thus precluding the use of such fitting procedure for accurate analysis under such conditions. In contrast, the fit performed based on NMR simulations accounting for RF spatial inhomogeneity matches the data almost perfectly – as expected since these simulations were used to generate the original data – giving order parameters values of 0.028 and 0.040, very close to the original values of 0.03 and 0.04 used. This suggests that, if the (coil dependent) RF spatial inhomogeneity across the sample is measured with reasonable accuracy, it would be possible to simulate a set of realistic data for the complete range of dipolar couplings (0–22 kHz for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). This would better describe the experimental measurements and therefore enable a more accurate analysis.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page119?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>R-PDLF fits including RF inhomogeneity enable higher accuracy and shorter experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e926">From the description shown in the preceding section, it is clear that RF spatial inhomogeneity affects the dipolar modulation in R-PDLF experiments. Therefore, for accurate fits of experimental data, this effect needs to be taken into account. In this and the following section we demonstrate that accounting for the effect of RF inhomogeneity in time-domain fits of experimental data indeed leads to highly accurate fits of the experimental data and consequently to a considerable improvement of the accuracy of the C–H bond order parameters determined. Instead of in the time domain, the fitting could also be performed in the frequency domain, i.e., by performing the Fourier transform of the experimental data in the indirect dimension and by then fitting these data with the Fourier transform of the numerical simulations. Here, we simply use time-domain fits and avoid performing the additional step of the Fourier transform which is unnecessary and has an extra computational time cost.</p>
      <p id="d1e929">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the application of this time-domain analysis to a sample of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (POPE) multilamellar vesicles (MLVs), illustrating the analysis method on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbon of the POPE headgroup. POPE is one of the most abundant lipids in cellular membranes. It has recently been investigated with R-PDLF NMR in the context of the NMRlipids project. This project aims to resolve the atomistic molecular structure of the most abundant lipids in nature. To this end, the project uses a combination of solid-state NMR experiments and all-atom molecular dynamics simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.31"/>. Using only the first eight points along the indirect dimension, the time-domain curve fitted to the experimental dipolar modulation measured for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbons gives an estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.028<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.009</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.034</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the superscript and subscript are upper and lower limits as defined in the Supplement. Such a fit enables us to predict the experimental dipolar spectrum that one would obtain using a higher number of indirect dimension points as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b and c. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d shows how the time-domain fit procedure enables the estimation of an accurate order parameter using much shorter experiments in comparison to the use of the typical Fourier transform methodology (gray circles). As it will be shown in a later section, this is particularly useful for complex systems for which only a limited number of indirect dimension points can be measured. Moreover, the fit procedure enables the estimation of the uncertainty of the value measured (the detailed description for defining the errors is given in the Supplement), which is more difficult to define with the Fourier transform “read-off” method alone. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d also shows the result of using fits with the ideal model (i.e., that does not include the effect of RF inhomogeneity). One observes that these fits become<?pagebreak page120?> less accurate with an increase of the number of points used (a comparison with the model including RF inhomogeneity is also given in the Supplement in Fig. S2). This is a consequence of the effect of RF inhomogeneity which becomes more prominent at longer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times. However, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d also suggests that fitting with the ideal model may provide good results when analyzing short <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals. Based on previous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR measurements, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> methylene carbon is expected to have the equivalent order parameters for the two C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>H bonds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.32"/>. In the next section we demonstrate the usefulness of R-PDLF time-domain fits to analyze cases of two-component dipolar modulations and estimate the accuracy of the order parameters determined with the proposed method by comparison with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR quadrupolar splittings.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1056">The proposed method applied to a sample of POPE MLVs. <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C rINEPT spectrum of the POPE MLVs. <bold>(b)</bold> Time-domain (TD) fit accounting for RF inhomogeneity of the dipolar dimension of an R-PDLF experiment with a total of eight points (thick solid line). The experimental dipolar spectrum is shown on the right together with the fit prediction of the experimental dipolar spectrum (using a total of 32 time-domain points). The thin lines show the time-domain curves that correspond to the error limits as defined in the Supplement. <bold>(c)</bold> The same as in <bold>(b)</bold> but fitting a total of 32 experimental points in the indirect dimension. A single-exponential decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 Hz was multiplied to the simulated data. <bold>(d)</bold> Order parameter estimated by the time-domain fit including RF inhomogeneity (blue), with the ideal model (red), and calculated from the dipolar splitting in the Fourier transform of the experimental data (gray) as function of the total number of points in the indirect dimension used. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1100">The proposed methodology applied to a sample of a DMPC/DMPCd54 liquid crystalline system. <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C rINEPT spectrum and labels used to identify different carbons. <bold>(b)</bold> Time-domain fits neglecting the RF inhomogeneity across the sample. <bold>(c)</bold> Time-domain fits accounting for the RF inhomogeneity across the sample using one single dipolar coupling as fit parameter and neglecting any possible relaxation during <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(d)</bold> The same as in <bold>(c)</bold> but using two dipolar couplings as fit parameters assuming a two-component dipolar modulation. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1147"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR spectrum of the DMPC/DMPCd54 liquid crystalline system and symbols showing the positions used to determine order parameters.   </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison with ${}^{2}$H NMR quadrupolar splittings}?><title>Comparison with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR quadrupolar splittings</title>
      <p id="d1e1182">To further test the accuracy of using a model of R-PDLF experiments that includes RF inhomogeneity, we used a water/DMPC/DMPCd54 liquid crystalline system (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase), such that it was possible to measure the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR spectrum of the perdeuterated acyl chains of the DMPCd54 molecules and compare it with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C dipolar couplings determined from the acyl chains of the molecules with natural abundance of isotopes. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the R-PDLF dipolar modulation for a number of resolved carbons from the liquid crystalline system and their corresponding fits with and without accounting for RF inhomogeneity. The improvement of the fits by accounting for RF inhomogeneity is visually evident, especially for the smaller coupling. We stress here that the RF inhomogeneity profile used in the simulations was experimentally measured and modeled by a Gaussian profile. The RF inhomogeneity is therefore an objectively quantified a priori constraint that we have obtained from an independent experiment. Moreover, since each of the three carbon peaks analyzed is a sum of components from the two individual acyl chains, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-2, we also performed the time-domain fits of the dipolar modulations using two components. In the case of the acyl chain methyl groups <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, equivalent dipolar couplings minimize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the other hand, for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> methylenes, two distinct dipolar couplings enable a better fit than a single value which suggests a distinct motional geometry in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-2 acyl chains for these methylenes (a detailed analysis is given in the Supplement). The non-equivalence of these order parameters is in agreement with previous investigations of specifically deuterated dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) molecules <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.33"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1315">Comparison of the order parameter magnitudes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, determined from the DMPC/DMPCd54 liquid crystalline sample for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> carbons from using the observed splitting in the frequency domain (FT) of an R-PDLF experiment with a total of 32 points in the indirect dimension, from time-domain (TD) fits with numerical simulations either accounting or not for the effect of RF inhomogeneity on R-PDLF experiments and using a single or two order parameters, and from quadrupolar splittings observed with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H quadrupolar echo.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carbon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Fit with ideal simulations </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">Fit with RF inhomogeneity </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">label</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1 comp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 comp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 comp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2 comp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.023</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.014</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.028</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.026</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.024</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.022</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.028</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.023</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.008</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.019</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.024</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.083</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.094</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.092</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.097</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.102</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.099</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.106</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.090</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.088</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.092</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.096</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.088</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.103</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.098</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.088</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.084</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.091</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.085</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.081</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.092</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.083</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.123</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.132</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.127</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.138</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.118</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.116</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.121</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.122</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.115</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.132</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.127</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.118</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.114</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.121</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.115</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.122</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.115</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page121?><p id="d1e1865">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR spectrum measured from DMPCd54 molecules is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. The five lowest quadrupolar splittings were used to calculate C–D bond order parameters. The results are included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> together with the results from the time-domain fits of the dipolar modulations from the molecules with natural abundance of isotopes.
The agreement between the values obtained by using the different techniques is striking. The maximum difference between the order parameter magnitudes determined with the methodology proposed and the values determined from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR spectrum is below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.005, much below the errors reported previously (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02) when doing similar comparisons between dipolar recoupling experiments with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR spectroscopy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.34"/>. Here, we used values taken from previous studies for the rigid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C dipolar and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H quadrupolar couplings, namely 22 and 126 kHz, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.35"/>. We may therefore exclude a significant isotope effect on the molecular dynamics of the acyl chains in the water/DMPC/DMPCd54 liquid crystalline system. Moreover, we can unambiguously assign the C–D order parameters measured with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR based on the two-component fits of the R-PDLF data.
The measurement of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR spectrum alone (from perdeuterated acyl chains) does not provide information concerning the origin of each of the distinct quadrupolar splittings observed. However, R-PDLF enables chemical shift selectivity in the direct dimension. By fitting the indirect dimension time domain of the R-PDLF experiment for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-1, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-2 carbons with two components (one per acyl chain), one readily enables the assignment of the five lowest quadrupole couplings in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR spectrum.</p>
      <p id="d1e1998">The agreement between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR and R-PDLF values highlights the usefulness of modeling R-PDLF data in contrast to the conventional dipolar splitting read-off from the frequency-domain analysis. Such distinct dipolar couplings cannot be observed in the dipolar spectrum due to the limited number of points measured as described previously. In fact, in this case, from the read-off method one obtains for both the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> carbons the lowest order parameters with great precision. The only fitting parameters used to make all the plots shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> were the dipolar couplings (i.e.,<?pagebreak page122?> order parameters), namely just one fitting parameter in case of a one-component fit and two fitting parameters in case of a two-component fit. In the case of the two-component fits we have assumed that the intensity for each component was equal. This is a reasonable assumption in this case, because the expected differences between the order parameters and the dynamics of the two acyl chains are very small. Therefore, the rINEPT intensity of each component should be very similar according to the theoretical model for the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C rINEPT intensity on CH order parameter and correlation times described by Topgaard and coworkers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.36"/>. In general though, two-component fits may require fitting also the relative magnitude of each component for obtaining a good fit. Here we opted for a minimal amount of fitting parameters, i.e., the simplest model enabling to match the experimental data within experimental uncertainty.</p>
      <p id="d1e2049">For determining the numbers shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, we have additionally used a phenomenological single exponential relaxation contribution as described in the Supplement. This did not affect the order parameters of the two-component fits determined for the carbons <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-2. On the other hand, for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbon, without inclusion of the single exponential relaxation, the order parameters calculated were 0.026 and 0.020. The line broadening corresponding to the minimum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the single-component fits shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> using the model that includes RF inhomogeneity was in the range of 4–10 Hz. On the other hand, for the model that does not account for RF inhomogeneity, the resulting line broadening from the minimization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases significantly in some cases, especially for low frequency dipolar modulations, to as much as 70 Hz. Such an increased relaxation rate is due to the significant deviation of the ideal model from the experimental data as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbon. For fits with the ideal model that do not lead to such large relaxation rates, although the minimum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is higher than for the model including RF inhomogeneity (as shown in the Supplement in Figs. S2–S8), the fitting outcome is also good (which is the case for the methylene carbons in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and for fits of short <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2140"> Phospholipid headgroup C–H bond order parameter magnitudes determined from a brain lipid extract using time-domain fits accounting for B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhomogeneity. The polarization transfer method used was rINEPT, recycle delay was 5 s,  MAS rate was 5 kHz, and a total of 4096 scans were acquired for each point in the indirect dimension which amounts roughly to 2 d of experimental time. <bold>(a)</bold> Chemical structures and carbon labels of the most abundant phospholipids in the brain lipid extract are phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylcholine (PC), and phosphatidylserine (PS). <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C rINEPT spectrum of the brain lipid extract membranes together with reference spectra for the most abundant lipids. The additional labels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were used to identify cholesterol and galactose peaks, respectively. <bold>(c)</bold> Application of the proposed methodology for fitting the dipolar modulations and determining the corresponding order parameter magnitudes for selected carbons.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/4/115/2023/mr-4-115-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Application to a brain lipid extract</title>
      <p id="d1e2208">To showcase the applicability of the presented methodology, we investigated the molecular structure of a complex membrane system composed of a brain lipid extract with several<?pagebreak page123?> lipid types present. The lipid mixture consists of the chloroform <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> methanol extract of porcine brain tissue as purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids.</p>
      <p id="d1e2218">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C spectrum of the brain lipid extract at excess hydration together with spectra acquired from single phospholipid model systems. Due to the much higher complexity of the brain lipid extract sample in comparison to model membrane systems (usually composed of one to three distinct components), the number of transients required to achieve a reasonable signal-to-noise ratio is considerably higher. Here, 4096 transients were acquired for each point in the indirect dimension with a total experimental time cost of approximately 48 h (in comparison to the 256 transients used for the simple model systems). The comparison of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C spectra measured from the brain extract with the spectra from the simple models enables one to identify a number of peaks from different components known to exist in the extract (according to the chemical composition provided by Avanti Polar Lipids for 41.3 wt % of the lipid extract), namely the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> segments of the headgroup of phosphatidylcholine (PC), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> segments of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> segments of phosphatidylserine (PS). From inspection of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C rINEPT spectrum, and knowing the lipid composition of myelin that makes up most of the dry weight of brain tissue <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.37"/>, it is clear that most of the remaining unknown 58.7 wt % content of the lipid extract is cholesterol plus a considerable fraction of galactose cerebrosides (GalCer) labeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b, respectively.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2323">Order parameter magnitudes determined from a brain lipid extract using the methodology proposed in this work as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. The superscript and subscript for each value denote upper and lower 90 % confidence bounds as shown in the Supplement (Fig. S9). The values are compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR values measured from phospholipid model systems reported previously.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carbon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Brain extract</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">Model system </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">segment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CD</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">model</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (PC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.044</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.041</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.048</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.048<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DPPC/chol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.38"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.049<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DOPC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.39"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.048<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">POPC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.40"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (PC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.014</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.024<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DPPC/chol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.41"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.029<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DOPC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.42"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.044<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">POPC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.43"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (PC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.008</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.008<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DPPC/chol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.44"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (PE)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.066</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.055</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.082</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.063<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DPPE/chol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.45"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (PE)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.019</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.024</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.020<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DPPE/chol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.46"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (PS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.026</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.032</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.016<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">POPC/POPS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.47"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (PS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.031</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.052</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.091<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">POPC/POPS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.48"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.062<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">+ 1 M CaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.49"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2337"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page124?><p id="d1e2954">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c shows the indirect time-domain modulation for a number of identified peaks in the spectra measured by R-PDLF spectroscopy. In this case, due to the large number of transients required to achieve a reasonable signal-to-noise ratio (4096 scans), only very short indirect dimension modulations can be measured. Namely, only eight points in the indirect dimension were acquired for the brain lipid extract sample. Such a reduced total indirect dimension time is not sufficient to obtain dipolar splittings after Fourier transformation. However, application of time-domain fitting including RF inhomogeneity enables the determination of the dipolar couplings and, therefore, the estimation of C–H bond order parameters. The estimated order parameters are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2961">The headgroup order parameters determined from the set of different phospholipid types in the brain lipid extract are very much in line with what is observed in corresponding lipid model membranes. The only exception is the PS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> order parameter with a rather small order parameter equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.031</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.052</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This suggests that the brain lipid extract may contain calcium ions that are known to significantly affect the PS headgroup orientation. A thorough analysis of the order parameters in terms of the molecular structure in the complex brain lipid extract system will not be given here. Such analysis should be done in combination with experiments and MD simulations on PC/PE/PS/cholesterol/GalCer model membranes which resemble the lipid extract composition, to investigate potential phase separation behavior, effects of distinct ions present in the system and pH, or ultimately the effect of macromolecules such as basic myelin protein, the most abundant protein in myelin. We believe that such a combined approach will lead to a more accurate description of the lipid/protein interactions in myelin, which may be important in the context of a number of diseases related to demyelination. The methodology proposed here will enable one to perform such investigations with higher accuracy using shorter experiments and without the requirement of isotopic labeling. Moreover, we envision applications to many other complex membranes such as bacterial membrane models, eukaryotic membrane models with cell type or organelle-specific compositions, technological systems such as lipid–nanoparticles, and to address the molecular structure/orientation of drugs, peptides, or other molecules with anisotropic motion in lipid membranes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2993">In summary, we have described a PDLF NMR methodology that consists of performing time-domain fits of the dipolar modulation with numerical simulations that account for the RF spatial inhomogeneity of the probe used. The RF inhomogeneity is experimentally measured and is an a priori constraint. A dipolar modulation of a single component is therefore fitted with only two parameters, the dipolar coupling and a phenomenological relaxation time to account for exponential relaxation. The proposed methodology enables one to<?pagebreak page125?> determine C–H bond order parameters from simple model systems with a much higher accuracy than previously and enables the investigation of complex lipid membrane systems that were so far inaccessible using the conventional read-off PDLF NMR methodology. We believe that the method presented will be extremely useful in the future concerning molecular structural investigations of complex systems such as multi-component models, lipid extracts, and lipid membranes with drugs, peptides, or other molecules incorporated. Moreover, the higher accuracy and farther reach of the method will also be fundamental to validate molecular dynamics simulations for which structural experimental data were not accessible so far.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3001">The simulation data and code used for the publication can be found at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7898743" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7898743</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.50"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3010">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-115-2023-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-115-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3019">TMF conceived the project. TMF and AW developed the code. TMF and AW performed experiments and processed the experimental data. TMF, AW, and KS analyzed and discussed the results and the paper. TMF wrote the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3025">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Magnetic Resonance</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3034">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3040">Tiago Mendes Ferreira greatly acknowledges Alexey Krushelnitsky for invaluable support and discussions. This research study was funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG; project no. 189853844, TRR 102, Tiago Mendes Ferreira and Anika Wurl).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3045">This research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project no. 189853844, TRR 102).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3051">This paper was edited by Beat Meier and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Aisenbrey et~al.({2019})Aisenbrey, Salnikov, and
Bechinger}}?><label>Aisenbrey et al.(2019)Aisenbrey, Salnikov, and
Bechinger</label><?label Ais19:371?><mixed-citation>Aisenbrey, C., Salnikov, E., and Bechinger, B.: Solid-State NMR Investigations
of the MHC II Transmembrane Domains: Topological Equilibria and Lipid
Interactions, J. Mem. Biol., 252, 371–384,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-019-00071-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00232-019-00071-8</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Andersson et~al.(2017)Andersson, Grey, Larsson, Ferreira, and
Sparr}}?><label>Andersson et al.(2017)Andersson, Grey, Larsson, Ferreira, and
Sparr</label><?label And17:E3592?><mixed-citation>Andersson, J. M., Grey, C., Larsson, M., Ferreira, T. M., and Sparr, E.: Effect
of cholesterol on the molecular structure and transitions in a clinical-grade
lung surfactant extract, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, E3592–E3601,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701239114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1701239114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Asami and Reif(2017)}}?><label>Asami and Reif(2017)</label><?label Asa17:8719?><mixed-citation>Asami, S. and Reif, B.: Comparative Study of REDOR and CPPI Derived Order
Parameters by 1H-Detected MAS NMR and MD Simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B, 121,
8719–8730, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06812" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06812</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bacle et~al.(2021)Bacle, Buslaev, Garcia-Fandino, Favela-Rosales,
Ferreira, Fuchs, Gushchin, Javanainen, Kiirikki, Madsen, Melcr,
Milán~Rodríguez, Miettinen, Ollila, Papadopoulos, Peón, Piggot, Piñeiro,
and Virtanen}}?><label>Bacle et al.(2021)Bacle, Buslaev, Garcia-Fandino, Favela-Rosales,
Ferreira, Fuchs, Gushchin, Javanainen, Kiirikki, Madsen, Melcr,
Milán Rodríguez, Miettinen, Ollila, Papadopoulos, Peón, Piggot, Piñeiro,
and Virtanen</label><?label Bac21:13701?><mixed-citation>Bacle, A., Buslaev, P., Garcia-Fandino, R., Favela-Rosales, F., Ferreira, T.,
Fuchs, P., Gushchin, I., Javanainen, M., Kiirikki, A., Madsen, J., Melcr, J.,
Milán Rodríguez, P., Miettinen, M., Ollila, O., Papadopoulos, C., Peón,
A., Piggot, T., Piñeiro, A., and Virtanen, S.: Inverse Conformational
Selection in Lipid–Protein Binding, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 143,
13701–13709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c05549" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.1c05549</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bechinger and Seelig(1991)}}?><label>Bechinger and Seelig(1991)</label><?label Bec91:1?><mixed-citation>Bechinger, B. and Seelig, J.: Conformational changes of the phosphatidylcholine
headgroup due to membrane dehydration. A 2H-NMR study, Chemistry and Physics
of Lipids, 58, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-3084(91)90105-K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0009-3084(91)90105-K</ext-link>,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brown and Seelig(1978)}}?><label>Brown and Seelig(1978)</label><?label Bro78:381?><mixed-citation>Brown, M. and Seelig, J.: Influence of cholesterol on the polar region of
phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers, Biochemistry, 17,
381–384, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00595a029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/bi00595a029</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bärenwald et~al.(2016)Bärenwald, Achilles, Lange, Ferreira, and
Saalwächter}}?><label>Bärenwald et al.(2016)Bärenwald, Achilles, Lange, Ferreira, and
Saalwächter</label><?label Bar16:2073?><mixed-citation>Bärenwald, R., Achilles, A., Lange, F., Ferreira, T. M., and Saalwächter, K.:
Applications of Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy for the Study of Lipid Membranes
with Polyphilic Guest (Macro)Molecules, Polymers, 8, 439,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8120439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/polym8120439</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cady et~al.(2007)Cady, Goodman, Tatko, DeGrado, and
Hong}}?><label>Cady et al.(2007)Cady, Goodman, Tatko, DeGrado, and
Hong</label><?label Cad07:5719?><mixed-citation>Cady, S., Goodman, C., Tatko, C., DeGrado, W., and Hong, M.: Determining the
Orientation of Uniaxially Rotating Membrane Proteins Using Unoriented
Samples:  A 2H, 13C, and 15N Solid-State NMR Investigation of the Dynamics
and Orientation of a Transmembrane Helical Bundle, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129,
5719–5729, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja070305e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja070305e</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cheng(2018)}}?><label>Cheng(2018)</label><?label Che18:58?><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y.: Membrane protein structural biology in the era of single particle
cryo-EM, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 52, 58–63,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2018.08.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.sbi.2018.08.008</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chevelkov et~al.(2009)Chevelkov, Fink, and Reif}}?><label>Chevelkov et al.(2009)Chevelkov, Fink, and Reif</label><?label Che09:14018?><mixed-citation>Chevelkov, V., Fink, U., and Reif, B.: Accurate Determination of Order
Parameters from 1H,15N Dipolar Couplings in MAS Solid-State NMR Experiments,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 14018–14022, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja902649u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja902649u</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Davis(1983)}}?><label>Davis(1983)</label><?label Dav83:117?><mixed-citation>Davis, J.: The description of membrane lipid conformation, order and dynamics
by 2H-NMR, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Reviews on Biomembranes,
737, 117–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4157(83)90015-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4157(83)90015-1</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Davis et~al.(2009)Davis, Clair, and Juhasz}}?><label>Davis et al.(2009)Davis, Clair, and Juhasz</label><?label Dav09:521?><mixed-citation>Davis, J. H., Clair, J. J., and Juhasz, J.: Phase equilibria in
DOPC/DPPC-d62/cholesterol mixtures, Biophys. J., 96, 521–539,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.042</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{De~Paëpe(2012)}}?><label>De Paëpe(2012)</label><?label Pae12:661?><mixed-citation>De Paëpe, G.: Dipolar Recoupling in Magic Angle Spinning Solid-State Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 63, 661–684,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143726</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page126?><ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{deAzevedo et~al.(2008)deAzevedo, Saalwachter, Pascui, de~Souza,
Bonagamba, and Reichert}}?><label>deAzevedo et al.(2008)deAzevedo, Saalwachter, Pascui, de Souza,
Bonagamba, and Reichert</label><?label Aze08:104505?><mixed-citation>deAzevedo, E., Saalwachter, K., Pascui, O., de Souza, A., Bonagamba, T., and
Reichert, D.: Intermediate motions as studied by solid-state separated local
field NMR experiments, J. Chem. Phys., 128, 104505,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2831798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.2831798</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dvinskikh et~al.(2005)Dvinskikh, Castro, and Sandström}}?><label>Dvinskikh et al.(2005)Dvinskikh, Castro, and Sandström</label><?label Dvi05:607?><mixed-citation>Dvinskikh, S., Castro, V., and Sandström, D.: Efficient solid-state NMR
methods for measuring heteronuclear dipolar couplings in unoriented lipid
membrane systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 7, 607–613,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b418131j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b418131j</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dvinskikh et~al.(2004)Dvinskikh, Zimmermann, Maliniak, and
Sandstrom}}?><label>Dvinskikh et al.(2004)Dvinskikh, Zimmermann, Maliniak, and
Sandstrom</label><?label Dvi04:194?><mixed-citation>
Dvinskikh, S. V., Zimmermann, H., Maliniak, A., and Sandstrom, D.: Measurements
of motionally averaged heteronuclear dipolar couplings in MAS NMR using
R-type recoupling, J. Magn. Reson., 168, 194–201, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ferreira et~al.(2013)Ferreira, Coreta-Gomes, Ollila, Moreno, Vaz, and
Topgaard}}?><label>Ferreira et al.(2013)Ferreira, Coreta-Gomes, Ollila, Moreno, Vaz, and
Topgaard</label><?label Fer13:1976?><mixed-citation>Ferreira, T. M., Coreta-Gomes, F., Ollila, O. H. S., Moreno, M. J., Vaz, W.
L. C., and Topgaard, D.: Cholesterol and POPC segmental order parameters in
lipid membranes: solid state 1HÐ13C NMR and MD simulation studies, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 1976–1989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP42738A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C2CP42738A</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fridolf et~al.(2022)Fridolf, Hamid, Svenningsson, Skepö, Sparr, and
Topgaard}}?><label>Fridolf et al.(2022)Fridolf, Hamid, Svenningsson, Skepö, Sparr, and
Topgaard</label><?label Fri22:25588?><mixed-citation>Fridolf, S., Hamid, M., Svenningsson, L., Skepö, M., Sparr, E., and Topgaard,
D.: Molecular dynamics simulations and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance
spectroscopy measurements of C–H bond order parameters and effective
correlation times in a POPC-GM3 bilayer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 24,
25588–25601, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP02860C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D2CP02860C</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gally et~al.(1975)Gally, Niederberger, and Seelig}}?><label>Gally et al.(1975)Gally, Niederberger, and Seelig</label><?label Gal75:3647?><mixed-citation>Gally, H. U., Niederberger, W., and Seelig, J.: Conformation and motion of the
choline head group in bilayers of dipalmitoyl-3-sn-phosphatidylcholine,
Biochemistry, 14, 3647–3652, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00687a021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/bi00687a021</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gansmüller et~al.(2013)Gansmüller, Simorre, and
Hediger}}?><label>Gansmüller et al.(2013)Gansmüller, Simorre, and
Hediger</label><?label Gan13:154?><mixed-citation>Gansmüller, A., Simorre, J.-P., and Hediger, S.: Windowed R-PDLF recoupling: A
flexible and reliable tool to characterize molecular dynamics, J. Mag.
Reson., 234, 154–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.06.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmr.2013.06.017</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gauto et~al.(2019)Gauto, Estrozi, Schwieters, Effantin, Macek,
Sounier, Sivertsen, Schmidt, Kerfah, Mas, Colletier, Güntert, Favier,
Schoehn, Schanda, and Boisbouvier}}?><label>Gauto et al.(2019)Gauto, Estrozi, Schwieters, Effantin, Macek,
Sounier, Sivertsen, Schmidt, Kerfah, Mas, Colletier, Güntert, Favier,
Schoehn, Schanda, and Boisbouvier</label><?label Gau19:2697?><mixed-citation>Gauto, D., Estrozi, L., Schwieters, C., Effantin, G., Macek, P., Sounier, R.,
Sivertsen, A., Schmidt, E., Kerfah, R., Mas, G., Colletier, J., Güntert, P.,
Favier, A., Schoehn, G., Schanda, P., and Boisbouvier, J.: Integrated NMR and
cryo-EM atomic-resolution structure determination of a half-megadalton enzyme
complex, Nat. Commun., 10, 2697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10490-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-10490-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Griffin(1998)}}?><label>Griffin(1998)</label><?label Gri98:508?><mixed-citation>Griffin, R.: Dipolar recoupling in MAS spectra of biological solids, Nat.
Struct. Biol., 5, 508–512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/749" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/749</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gross et~al.(1997)Gross, Warschawski, and Griffin}}?><label>Gross et al.(1997)Gross, Warschawski, and Griffin</label><?label Gro97:796?><mixed-citation>
Gross, J. D., Warschawski, D. E., and Griffin, R. G.: Dipolar Recoupling in
MAS NMR:  A Probe for Segmental Order in Lipid Bilayers, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 119, 796–802, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gullion(1998)}}?><label>Gullion(1998)</label><?label Gul98:277?><mixed-citation>Gullion, T.: Introduction to rotational-echo, double-resonance NMR, Concepts
Magn. Reson., 10, 277–289,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0534(1998)10:5&lt;277::AID-CMR1&gt;3.0.CO;2-U" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0534(1998)10:5&lt;277::AID-CMR1&gt;3.0.CO;2-U</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hester et~al.(1976)Hester, Ackerman, Neff, and Waugh}}?><label>Hester et al.(1976)Hester, Ackerman, Neff, and Waugh</label><?label Hes76:1081?><mixed-citation>Hester, R., Ackerman, J., Neff, B., and Waugh, J.: Separated Local Field
Spectra in NMR: Determination of Structure of Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett., 36,
1081–1083, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1081</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hou et~al.(2011)Hou, Byeon, Ahn, Gronenborn, and
Polenova}}?><label>Hou et al.(2011)Hou, Byeon, Ahn, Gronenborn, and
Polenova</label><?label Hou11:18646?><mixed-citation>Hou, G., Byeon, I., Ahn, J., Gronenborn, A., and Polenova, T.:
1H–13C/1H–15N Heteronuclear Dipolar Recoupling by R-Symmetry Sequences
Under Fast Magic Angle Spinning for Dynamics Analysis of Biological and
Organic Solids, J. Am. Chem Soc., 133, 18646–18655,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja203771a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja203771a</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jain et~al.(2019)Jain, Mote, Hellwagner, Rajalakshmi, Ernst, Madhu,
and Agarwal}}?><label>Jain et al.(2019)Jain, Mote, Hellwagner, Rajalakshmi, Ernst, Madhu,
and Agarwal</label><?label Jai19:134201?><mixed-citation>Jain, M., Mote, K., Hellwagner, J., Rajalakshmi, G., Ernst, M., Madhu, P., and
Agarwal, V.: Measuring strong one-bond dipolar couplings using REDOR in
magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR, J. Chem. Phys., 150, 134201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.5088100</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Leftin and Brown({2011})}}?><label>Leftin and Brown(2011)</label><?label Lef11:818?><mixed-citation>Leftin, A. and Brown, M. F.: An NMR database for simulations of membrane
dynamics, Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr., 1808, 818–839,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.11.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.11.027</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Leftin et~al.(2014)Leftin, Molugu, Job, Beyer, and
Brown}}?><label>Leftin et al.(2014)Leftin, Molugu, Job, Beyer, and
Brown</label><?label Lef14:2274?><mixed-citation>Leftin, A., Molugu, T., Job, C., Beyer, K., and Brown, M.: Area per Lipid and
Cholesterol Interactions in Membranes from Separated Local-Field 13C NMR
Spectroscopy, Biophys. J., 107, 2274–2286,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.044</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Levitt(2007)}}?><label>Levitt(2007)</label><?label Lev07Enc?><mixed-citation>Levitt, M.: Symmetry-Based Pulse Sequences in Magic-Angle Spinning Solid-State
NMR, in: Encyclopedia of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Volume 9: Advances in NMR, edited by: Grant, D. M. and Harris, R. K., John Wiley and Sons, pp. 165–196,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm0551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm0551</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lindon and Ferrige(1980)}}?><label>Lindon and Ferrige(1980)</label><?label Lin80:27?><mixed-citation>Lindon, J. and Ferrige, A.: Digitisation and data processing in Fourier
transform NMR, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 14, 27–66,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6565(80)80002-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0079-6565(80)80002-1</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{L{\"{o}}ser et~al.(2018)L{\"{o}}ser, Saalw{\"{a}}chter, and
Ferreira}}?><label>Löser et al.(2018)Löser, Saalwächter, and
Ferreira</label><?label Los18:9751?><mixed-citation>Löser, L., Saalwächter, K., and Ferreira, T.: Liquid-liquid phase
coexistence in lipid membranes observed by natural abundance 1H-13C
solid-state NMR, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20, 9751–9754,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP01012A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C8CP01012A</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lu et~al.(2016)Lu, Zhang, Lu, Vega, Hou, and Polenova}}?><label>Lu et al.(2016)Lu, Zhang, Lu, Vega, Hou, and Polenova</label><?label Lu16:4035?><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Zhang, H., Lu, M., Vega, A. J., Hou, G., and Polenova, T.: Improving
dipolar recoupling for site-specific structural and dynamics studies in
biosolids NMR: windowed RN-symmetry sequences, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18,
4035–4044, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP07818K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP07818K</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mandala et~al.(2018)Mandala, Williams, and Hong}}?><label>Mandala et al.(2018)Mandala, Williams, and Hong</label><?label Man18:201?><mixed-citation>Mandala, V., Williams, J., and Hong, M.: Structure and Dynamics of Membrane
Proteins from Solid-State NMR, Annu. Rev. Biophys., 47, 201–222,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033712</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mandala et~al.(2020)Mandala, Loftis, Shcherbakov, Pentelute, and
Hong}}?><label>Mandala et al.(2020)Mandala, Loftis, Shcherbakov, Pentelute, and
Hong</label><?label Man20:160?><mixed-citation>Mandala, V., Loftis, A., Shcherbakov, A., Pentelute, B., and Hong, M.: Atomic
structures of closed and open influenza B M2 proton channel reveal the
conduction mechanism, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 27, 160–167,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0371-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41594-019-0371-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Mendes Ferreira and Wurl(2023)}?><label>Mendes Ferreira and Wurl(2023)</label><?label mendesdata?><mixed-citation>Mendes Ferreira, T. and Wurl, A.: Simulation data and code used for the publication in Magn. Reson. “Time-domain proton-detected local-field NMR for molecular structure determination in complex lipid membranes” (v1.0.0), Zenodo [code/data], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7898743" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7898743</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Molugu et~al.(2017)Molugu, Lee, and Brown}}?><label>Molugu et al.(2017)Molugu, Lee, and Brown</label><?label Mol17:10087?><mixed-citation>Molugu, T., Lee, S., and Brown, M.: Concepts and Methods of Solid-State NMR
Spectroscopy Applied to Biomembranes, Chem. Rev., 117, 12087–12132,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00619</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nakai and Terao(1992)}}?><label>Nakai and Terao(1992)</label><?label Nak92:42?><mixed-citation>Nakai, T. and Terao, T.: Measurements of heteronuclear dipolar powder patterns
due only to directly bonded couplings, Magn. Reson. Chem., 30, 42–44,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.1260300109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/mrc.1260300109</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nimerovsky and Soutar(2020)}}?><label>Nimerovsky and Soutar(2020)</label><?label Nim20:106827?><mixed-citation>Nimerovsky, E. and Soutar, C.: A modification of γ-encoded RN symmetry pulses
for increasing the scaling factor and more accurate measurements of the
strong heteronuclear dipolar couplings, J. Magn. Reson., 319, 106827,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106827</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nishimura et~al.(2001)Nishimura, Fu, and Cross}}?><label>Nishimura et al.(2001)Nishimura, Fu, and Cross</label><?label Nis01:227?><mixed-citation>Nishimura, K., Fu, R., and Cross, T. A.: The Effe<?pagebreak page127?>ct of RF Inhomogeneity on
Heteronuclear Dipolar Recoupling in Solid State NMR: Practical Performance of
SFAM and REDOR, J. Mag. Reson., 152, 227–233,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.2001.2410" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1006/jmre.2001.2410</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Norton and Autilio(1966)}}?><label>Norton and Autilio(1966)</label><?label Nor66:213?><mixed-citation>Norton, W. and Autilio, L.: The lipid composition of purified bovine brain
myelin, J. Neurochem., 13, 213–222,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1966.tb06794.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1471-4159.1966.tb06794.x</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nowacka et~al.(2010)Nowacka, Mohr, Norrman, Martin, and
Topgaard}}?><label>Nowacka et al.(2010)Nowacka, Mohr, Norrman, Martin, and
Topgaard</label><?label Now10:16848?><mixed-citation>Nowacka, A., Mohr, P., Norrman, J., Martin, R., and Topgaard, D.: Polarization
Transfer Solid-State NMR for Studying Surfactant Phase Behavior, Langmuir,
26, 16848–16856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/la102935t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/la102935t</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nowacka et~al.(2013)Nowacka, Bongartz, Ollila, Nylander, and
Topgaard}}?><label>Nowacka et al.(2013)Nowacka, Bongartz, Ollila, Nylander, and
Topgaard</label><?label Now13:165?><mixed-citation>Nowacka, A., Bongartz, N., Ollila, O., Nylander, T., and Topgaard, D.: Signal
intensities in 1H–13C CP and INEPT MAS NMR of liquid crystals, J. Magn.
Reson., 230, 165–175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.02.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmr.2013.02.016</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Odedra and Wimperis(2013)}}?><label>Odedra and Wimperis(2013)</label><?label Ode13:95?><mixed-citation>Odedra, S. and Wimperis, S.: Imaging of the B1 distribution and background
signal in a MAS NMR probehead using inhomogeneous B0 and B1 fields, J. Mag.
Reson., 231, 95–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmr.2013.04.002</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Park et~al.({2012})Park, Das, Casagrande, Tian, Nothnagel, Chu,
Kiefer, Maier, De~Angelis, Marassi, and Opella}}?><label>Park et al.(2012)Park, Das, Casagrande, Tian, Nothnagel, Chu,
Kiefer, Maier, De Angelis, Marassi, and Opella</label><?label Par12:779?><mixed-citation>Park, S., Das, B., Casagrande, F., Tian, Y., Nothnagel, H., Chu, M., Kiefer,
H., Maier, K., De Angelis, A., Marassi, F., and Opella, S.: Structure of the
chemokine receptor CXCR1 in phospholipid bilayers, Nature, 491,
779–784, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature11580</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Roux and Bloom(1990)}}?><label>Roux and Bloom(1990)</label><?label Rou90:7077?><mixed-citation>Roux, M. and Bloom, M.: Calcium, magnesium, lithium, sodium, and potassium
distributions in the headgroup region of binary membranes of
phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylserine as seen by deuterium NMR,
Biochemistry, 29, 7077–7089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00482a019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/bi00482a019</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schanda et~al.(2011)Schanda, Meier, and Ernst}}?><label>Schanda et al.(2011)Schanda, Meier, and Ernst</label><?label Sch11:1090?><mixed-citation>Schanda, P., Meier, B., and Ernst, M.: Accurate measurement of one-bond H–X
heteronuclear dipolar couplings in MAS solid-state NMR, J. Magn. Reson., 210,
246–259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2011.03.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmr.2011.03.015</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schmidt-Rohr et~al.(1994)Schmidt-Rohr, Nanz, Emsley, and
Pines}}?><label>Schmidt-Rohr et al.(1994)Schmidt-Rohr, Nanz, Emsley, and
Pines</label><?label Sch94:6668?><mixed-citation>Schmidt-Rohr, K., Nanz, D., Emsley, L., and Pines, A.: NMR Measurement of
Resolved Heteronuclear Dipole Couplings in Liquid Crystals and Lipids, J.
Phys. Chem., 98, 6668–6670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100078a002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/j100078a002</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Seelig(1977)}}?><label>Seelig(1977)</label><?label See77:353?><mixed-citation>Seelig, J.: Deuterium magnetic resonance: theory and application to lipid
membranes, Q. Rev. Biophys., 10, 353–418,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583500002948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0033583500002948</ext-link>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Seelig and Niederberger(1974)}}?><label>Seelig and Niederberger(1974)</label><?label See74:2069?><mixed-citation>Seelig, J. and Niederberger, W.: Deuterium-labeled lipids as structural probes
in liquid crystalline bilayers. Deuterium magnetic resonance study, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 96, 2069–2072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00814a014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja00814a014</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Strandberg and Ulrich(2004)}}?><label>Strandberg and Ulrich(2004)</label><?label Str04:89?><mixed-citation>Strandberg, E. and Ulrich, A.: NMR methods for studying membrane-active
antimicrobial peptides, Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A, 23A, 89–120,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.a.20024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cmr.a.20024</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tošner et~al.(2017)Tošner, Purea, Struppe, Wegner, Engelke, Glaser,
and Reif}}?><label>Tošner et al.(2017)Tošner, Purea, Struppe, Wegner, Engelke, Glaser,
and Reif</label><?label Tos17:20?><mixed-citation>Tošner, Z., Purea, A., Struppe, J. O., Wegner, S., Engelke, F., Glaser, S. J.,
and Reif, B.: Radiofrequency fields in MAS solid state NMR probes, J.
Magn. Reson., 284, 20–32,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.09.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmr.2017.09.002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ulrich and Watts(1994)}}?><label>Ulrich and Watts(1994)</label><?label Ulr94:1441?><mixed-citation>Ulrich, A. S. and Watts, A.: Molecular response of the lipid headgroup to
bilayer hydration monitored by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H NMR, Biophys. J., 66, 1441–1449,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80934-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80934-8</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Umegawa et~al.(2018)Umegawa, Matsumori, and Murata}}?><label>Umegawa et al.(2018)Umegawa, Matsumori, and Murata</label><?label Ume18:41?><mixed-citation>Umegawa, Y., Matsumori, N., and Murata, M.: Chapter Two – Recent Solid-State
NMR Studies of Hydrated Lipid Membranes, vol. 94 of Annual Reports on
NMR Spectroscopy,  41–72, Academic Press,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.arnmr.2017.12.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/bs.arnmr.2017.12.003</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wu and Lander(2020)}}?><label>Wu and Lander(2020)</label><?label Wu20:9?><mixed-citation>Wu, M. and Lander, G.: How low can we go? Structure determination of small
biological complexes using single-particle cryo-EM, Curr. Opin. Struct.
Biol., 64, 9–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2020.05.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.sbi.2020.05.007</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Xue et~al.(2022)Xue, Nimerovsky, Tekwani~Movellan, Becker, and
Andreas}}?><label>Xue et al.(2022)Xue, Nimerovsky, Tekwani Movellan, Becker, and
Andreas</label><?label Xue22:18?><mixed-citation>Xue, K., Nimerovsky, E., Tekwani Movellan, K., Becker, S., and Andreas, L.:
Backbone Torsion Angle Determination Using Proton Detected Magic-Angle
Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 13, 18–24,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03267</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zerweck et~al.(2017)Zerweck, Strandberg, Kukharenko, Reichert,
Buerck, Wadhwani, and Ulrich}}?><label>Zerweck et al.(2017)Zerweck, Strandberg, Kukharenko, Reichert,
Buerck, Wadhwani, and Ulrich</label><?label Zer17:2045?><mixed-citation>Zerweck, J., Strandberg, E., Kukharenko, O., Reichert, J., Buerck, J.,
Wadhwani, P., and Ulrich, A.: Molecular mechanism of synergy between the
antimicrobial peptides PGLa and magainin 2, Sci. Rep., 7, 13153,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12599-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-12599-7</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Time-domain proton-detected local-field NMR for molecular structure determination in complex lipid membranes</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Aisenbrey et al.(2019)Aisenbrey, Salnikov, and
Bechinger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aisenbrey, C., Salnikov, E., and Bechinger, B.: Solid-State NMR Investigations
of the MHC II Transmembrane Domains: Topological Equilibria and Lipid
Interactions, J. Mem. Biol., 252, 371–384,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-019-00071-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-019-00071-8</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Andersson et al.(2017)Andersson, Grey, Larsson, Ferreira, and
Sparr</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andersson, J. M., Grey, C., Larsson, M., Ferreira, T. M., and Sparr, E.: Effect
of cholesterol on the molecular structure and transitions in a clinical-grade
lung surfactant extract, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, E3592–E3601,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701239114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701239114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Asami and Reif(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Asami, S. and Reif, B.: Comparative Study of REDOR and CPPI Derived Order
Parameters by 1H-Detected MAS NMR and MD Simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B, 121,
8719–8730, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06812" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06812</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bacle et al.(2021)Bacle, Buslaev, Garcia-Fandino, Favela-Rosales,
Ferreira, Fuchs, Gushchin, Javanainen, Kiirikki, Madsen, Melcr,
Milán Rodríguez, Miettinen, Ollila, Papadopoulos, Peón, Piggot, Piñeiro,
and Virtanen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bacle, A., Buslaev, P., Garcia-Fandino, R., Favela-Rosales, F., Ferreira, T.,
Fuchs, P., Gushchin, I., Javanainen, M., Kiirikki, A., Madsen, J., Melcr, J.,
Milán Rodríguez, P., Miettinen, M., Ollila, O., Papadopoulos, C., Peón,
A., Piggot, T., Piñeiro, A., and Virtanen, S.: Inverse Conformational
Selection in Lipid–Protein Binding, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 143,
13701–13709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c05549" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c05549</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bechinger and Seelig(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bechinger, B. and Seelig, J.: Conformational changes of the phosphatidylcholine
headgroup due to membrane dehydration. A 2H-NMR study, Chemistry and Physics
of Lipids, 58, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-3084(91)90105-K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-3084(91)90105-K</a>,
1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Brown and Seelig(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brown, M. and Seelig, J.: Influence of cholesterol on the polar region of
phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers, Biochemistry, 17,
381–384, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00595a029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00595a029</a>, 1978.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bärenwald et al.(2016)Bärenwald, Achilles, Lange, Ferreira, and
Saalwächter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bärenwald, R., Achilles, A., Lange, F., Ferreira, T. M., and Saalwächter, K.:
Applications of Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy for the Study of Lipid Membranes
with Polyphilic Guest (Macro)Molecules, Polymers, 8, 439,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8120439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8120439</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Cady et al.(2007)Cady, Goodman, Tatko, DeGrado, and
Hong</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cady, S., Goodman, C., Tatko, C., DeGrado, W., and Hong, M.: Determining the
Orientation of Uniaxially Rotating Membrane Proteins Using Unoriented
Samples:  A 2H, 13C, and 15N Solid-State NMR Investigation of the Dynamics
and Orientation of a Transmembrane Helical Bundle, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129,
5719–5729, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja070305e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja070305e</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Cheng(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Y.: Membrane protein structural biology in the era of single particle
cryo-EM, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 52, 58–63,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2018.08.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2018.08.008</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Chevelkov et al.(2009)Chevelkov, Fink, and Reif</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chevelkov, V., Fink, U., and Reif, B.: Accurate Determination of Order
Parameters from 1H,15N Dipolar Couplings in MAS Solid-State NMR Experiments,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 14018–14022, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja902649u" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja902649u</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Davis(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davis, J.: The description of membrane lipid conformation, order and dynamics
by 2H-NMR, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Reviews on Biomembranes,
737, 117–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4157(83)90015-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4157(83)90015-1</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Davis et al.(2009)Davis, Clair, and Juhasz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davis, J. H., Clair, J. J., and Juhasz, J.: Phase equilibria in
DOPC/DPPC-d62/cholesterol mixtures, Biophys. J., 96, 521–539,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.042</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>De Paëpe(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Paëpe, G.: Dipolar Recoupling in Magic Angle Spinning Solid-State Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 63, 661–684,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143726</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>deAzevedo et al.(2008)deAzevedo, Saalwachter, Pascui, de Souza,
Bonagamba, and Reichert</label><mixed-citation>
      
deAzevedo, E., Saalwachter, K., Pascui, O., de Souza, A., Bonagamba, T., and
Reichert, D.: Intermediate motions as studied by solid-state separated local
field NMR experiments, J. Chem. Phys., 128, 104505,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2831798" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2831798</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Dvinskikh et al.(2005)Dvinskikh, Castro, and Sandström</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dvinskikh, S., Castro, V., and Sandström, D.: Efficient solid-state NMR
methods for measuring heteronuclear dipolar couplings in unoriented lipid
membrane systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 7, 607–613,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b418131j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b418131j</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Dvinskikh et al.(2004)Dvinskikh, Zimmermann, Maliniak, and
Sandstrom</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dvinskikh, S. V., Zimmermann, H., Maliniak, A., and Sandstrom, D.: Measurements
of motionally averaged heteronuclear dipolar couplings in MAS NMR using
R-type recoupling, J. Magn. Reson., 168, 194–201, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Ferreira et al.(2013)Ferreira, Coreta-Gomes, Ollila, Moreno, Vaz, and
Topgaard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ferreira, T. M., Coreta-Gomes, F., Ollila, O. H. S., Moreno, M. J., Vaz, W.
L. C., and Topgaard, D.: Cholesterol and POPC segmental order parameters in
lipid membranes: solid state 1HÐ13C NMR and MD simulation studies, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 1976–1989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP42738A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP42738A</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fridolf et al.(2022)Fridolf, Hamid, Svenningsson, Skepö, Sparr, and
Topgaard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fridolf, S., Hamid, M., Svenningsson, L., Skepö, M., Sparr, E., and Topgaard,
D.: Molecular dynamics simulations and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance
spectroscopy measurements of C–H bond order parameters and effective
correlation times in a POPC-GM3 bilayer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 24,
25588–25601, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP02860C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP02860C</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Gally et al.(1975)Gally, Niederberger, and Seelig</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gally, H. U., Niederberger, W., and Seelig, J.: Conformation and motion of the
choline head group in bilayers of dipalmitoyl-3-sn-phosphatidylcholine,
Biochemistry, 14, 3647–3652, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00687a021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00687a021</a>, 1975.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Gansmüller et al.(2013)Gansmüller, Simorre, and
Hediger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gansmüller, A., Simorre, J.-P., and Hediger, S.: Windowed R-PDLF recoupling: A
flexible and reliable tool to characterize molecular dynamics, J. Mag.
Reson., 234, 154–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.06.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.06.017</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Gauto et al.(2019)Gauto, Estrozi, Schwieters, Effantin, Macek,
Sounier, Sivertsen, Schmidt, Kerfah, Mas, Colletier, Güntert, Favier,
Schoehn, Schanda, and Boisbouvier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gauto, D., Estrozi, L., Schwieters, C., Effantin, G., Macek, P., Sounier, R.,
Sivertsen, A., Schmidt, E., Kerfah, R., Mas, G., Colletier, J., Güntert, P.,
Favier, A., Schoehn, G., Schanda, P., and Boisbouvier, J.: Integrated NMR and
cryo-EM atomic-resolution structure determination of a half-megadalton enzyme
complex, Nat. Commun., 10, 2697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10490-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10490-9</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Griffin(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Griffin, R.: Dipolar recoupling in MAS spectra of biological solids, Nat.
Struct. Biol., 5, 508–512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/749" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/749</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Gross et al.(1997)Gross, Warschawski, and Griffin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gross, J. D., Warschawski, D. E., and Griffin, R. G.: Dipolar Recoupling in
MAS NMR:  A Probe for Segmental Order in Lipid Bilayers, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 119, 796–802, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Gullion(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gullion, T.: Introduction to rotational-echo, double-resonance NMR, Concepts
Magn. Reson., 10, 277–289,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0534(1998)10:5&lt;277::AID-CMR1&gt;3.0.CO;2-U" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0534(1998)10:5&lt;277::AID-CMR1&gt;3.0.CO;2-U</a>,
1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hester et al.(1976)Hester, Ackerman, Neff, and Waugh</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hester, R., Ackerman, J., Neff, B., and Waugh, J.: Separated Local Field
Spectra in NMR: Determination of Structure of Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett., 36,
1081–1083, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1081</a>, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hou et al.(2011)Hou, Byeon, Ahn, Gronenborn, and
Polenova</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hou, G., Byeon, I., Ahn, J., Gronenborn, A., and Polenova, T.:
1H–13C/1H–15N Heteronuclear Dipolar Recoupling by R-Symmetry Sequences
Under Fast Magic Angle Spinning for Dynamics Analysis of Biological and
Organic Solids, J. Am. Chem Soc., 133, 18646–18655,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja203771a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja203771a</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Jain et al.(2019)Jain, Mote, Hellwagner, Rajalakshmi, Ernst, Madhu,
and Agarwal</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jain, M., Mote, K., Hellwagner, J., Rajalakshmi, G., Ernst, M., Madhu, P., and
Agarwal, V.: Measuring strong one-bond dipolar couplings using REDOR in
magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR, J. Chem. Phys., 150, 134201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088100</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Leftin and Brown(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leftin, A. and Brown, M. F.: An NMR database for simulations of membrane
dynamics, Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr., 1808, 818–839,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.11.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.11.027</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Leftin et al.(2014)Leftin, Molugu, Job, Beyer, and
Brown</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leftin, A., Molugu, T., Job, C., Beyer, K., and Brown, M.: Area per Lipid and
Cholesterol Interactions in Membranes from Separated Local-Field 13C NMR
Spectroscopy, Biophys. J., 107, 2274–2286,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.044</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Levitt(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Levitt, M.: Symmetry-Based Pulse Sequences in Magic-Angle Spinning Solid-State
NMR, in: Encyclopedia of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Volume 9: Advances in NMR, edited by: Grant, D. M. and Harris, R. K., John Wiley and Sons, pp. 165–196,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm0551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm0551</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Lindon and Ferrige(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lindon, J. and Ferrige, A.: Digitisation and data processing in Fourier
transform NMR, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 14, 27–66,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6565(80)80002-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6565(80)80002-1</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Löser et al.(2018)Löser, Saalwächter, and
Ferreira</label><mixed-citation>
      
Löser, L., Saalwächter, K., and Ferreira, T.: Liquid-liquid phase
coexistence in lipid membranes observed by natural abundance 1H-13C
solid-state NMR, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20, 9751–9754,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP01012A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP01012A</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Lu et al.(2016)Lu, Zhang, Lu, Vega, Hou, and Polenova</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, X., Zhang, H., Lu, M., Vega, A. J., Hou, G., and Polenova, T.: Improving
dipolar recoupling for site-specific structural and dynamics studies in
biosolids NMR: windowed RN-symmetry sequences, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18,
4035–4044, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP07818K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP07818K</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Mandala et al.(2018)Mandala, Williams, and Hong</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mandala, V., Williams, J., and Hong, M.: Structure and Dynamics of Membrane
Proteins from Solid-State NMR, Annu. Rev. Biophys., 47, 201–222,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033712" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033712</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Mandala et al.(2020)Mandala, Loftis, Shcherbakov, Pentelute, and
Hong</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mandala, V., Loftis, A., Shcherbakov, A., Pentelute, B., and Hong, M.: Atomic
structures of closed and open influenza B M2 proton channel reveal the
conduction mechanism, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 27, 160–167,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0371-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0371-2</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Mendes Ferreira and Wurl(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mendes Ferreira, T. and Wurl, A.: Simulation data and code used for the publication in Magn. Reson. “Time-domain proton-detected local-field NMR for molecular structure determination in complex lipid membranes” (v1.0.0), Zenodo [code/data], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7898743" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7898743</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Molugu et al.(2017)Molugu, Lee, and Brown</label><mixed-citation>
      
Molugu, T., Lee, S., and Brown, M.: Concepts and Methods of Solid-State NMR
Spectroscopy Applied to Biomembranes, Chem. Rev., 117, 12087–12132,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00619</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Nakai and Terao(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nakai, T. and Terao, T.: Measurements of heteronuclear dipolar powder patterns
due only to directly bonded couplings, Magn. Reson. Chem., 30, 42–44,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.1260300109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.1260300109</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Nimerovsky and Soutar(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nimerovsky, E. and Soutar, C.: A modification of γ-encoded RN symmetry pulses
for increasing the scaling factor and more accurate measurements of the
strong heteronuclear dipolar couplings, J. Magn. Reson., 319, 106827,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106827</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Nishimura et al.(2001)Nishimura, Fu, and Cross</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nishimura, K., Fu, R., and Cross, T. A.: The Effect of RF Inhomogeneity on
Heteronuclear Dipolar Recoupling in Solid State NMR: Practical Performance of
SFAM and REDOR, J. Mag. Reson., 152, 227–233,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.2001.2410" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.2001.2410</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Norton and Autilio(1966)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Norton, W. and Autilio, L.: The lipid composition of purified bovine brain
myelin, J. Neurochem., 13, 213–222,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1966.tb06794.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1966.tb06794.x</a>, 1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Nowacka et al.(2010)Nowacka, Mohr, Norrman, Martin, and
Topgaard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nowacka, A., Mohr, P., Norrman, J., Martin, R., and Topgaard, D.: Polarization
Transfer Solid-State NMR for Studying Surfactant Phase Behavior, Langmuir,
26, 16848–16856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/la102935t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/la102935t</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Nowacka et al.(2013)Nowacka, Bongartz, Ollila, Nylander, and
Topgaard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nowacka, A., Bongartz, N., Ollila, O., Nylander, T., and Topgaard, D.: Signal
intensities in 1H–13C CP and INEPT MAS NMR of liquid crystals, J. Magn.
Reson., 230, 165–175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.02.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.02.016</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Odedra and Wimperis(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Odedra, S. and Wimperis, S.: Imaging of the B1 distribution and background
signal in a MAS NMR probehead using inhomogeneous B0 and B1 fields, J. Mag.
Reson., 231, 95–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.04.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.04.002</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Park et al.(2012)Park, Das, Casagrande, Tian, Nothnagel, Chu,
Kiefer, Maier, De Angelis, Marassi, and Opella</label><mixed-citation>
      
Park, S., Das, B., Casagrande, F., Tian, Y., Nothnagel, H., Chu, M., Kiefer,
H., Maier, K., De Angelis, A., Marassi, F., and Opella, S.: Structure of the
chemokine receptor CXCR1 in phospholipid bilayers, Nature, 491,
779–784, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11580" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11580</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Roux and Bloom(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roux, M. and Bloom, M.: Calcium, magnesium, lithium, sodium, and potassium
distributions in the headgroup region of binary membranes of
phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylserine as seen by deuterium NMR,
Biochemistry, 29, 7077–7089, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00482a019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00482a019</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Schanda et al.(2011)Schanda, Meier, and Ernst</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schanda, P., Meier, B., and Ernst, M.: Accurate measurement of one-bond H–X
heteronuclear dipolar couplings in MAS solid-state NMR, J. Magn. Reson., 210,
246–259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2011.03.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2011.03.015</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Schmidt-Rohr et al.(1994)Schmidt-Rohr, Nanz, Emsley, and
Pines</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmidt-Rohr, K., Nanz, D., Emsley, L., and Pines, A.: NMR Measurement of
Resolved Heteronuclear Dipole Couplings in Liquid Crystals and Lipids, J.
Phys. Chem., 98, 6668–6670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100078a002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/j100078a002</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Seelig(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seelig, J.: Deuterium magnetic resonance: theory and application to lipid
membranes, Q. Rev. Biophys., 10, 353–418,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583500002948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583500002948</a>, 1977.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Seelig and Niederberger(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seelig, J. and Niederberger, W.: Deuterium-labeled lipids as structural probes
in liquid crystalline bilayers. Deuterium magnetic resonance study, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 96, 2069–2072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00814a014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00814a014</a>, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Strandberg and Ulrich(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Strandberg, E. and Ulrich, A.: NMR methods for studying membrane-active
antimicrobial peptides, Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A, 23A, 89–120,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.a.20024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.a.20024</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Tošner et al.(2017)Tošner, Purea, Struppe, Wegner, Engelke, Glaser,
and Reif</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tošner, Z., Purea, A., Struppe, J. O., Wegner, S., Engelke, F., Glaser, S. J.,
and Reif, B.: Radiofrequency fields in MAS solid state NMR probes, J.
Magn. Reson., 284, 20–32,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.09.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.09.002</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Ulrich and Watts(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ulrich, A. S. and Watts, A.: Molecular response of the lipid headgroup to
bilayer hydration monitored by <sup>2</sup>H NMR, Biophys. J., 66, 1441–1449,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80934-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80934-8</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Umegawa et al.(2018)Umegawa, Matsumori, and Murata</label><mixed-citation>
      
Umegawa, Y., Matsumori, N., and Murata, M.: Chapter Two – Recent Solid-State
NMR Studies of Hydrated Lipid Membranes, vol. 94 of Annual Reports on
NMR Spectroscopy,  41–72, Academic Press,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.arnmr.2017.12.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.arnmr.2017.12.003</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Wu and Lander(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, M. and Lander, G.: How low can we go? Structure determination of small
biological complexes using single-particle cryo-EM, Curr. Opin. Struct.
Biol., 64, 9–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2020.05.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2020.05.007</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Xue et al.(2022)Xue, Nimerovsky, Tekwani Movellan, Becker, and
Andreas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xue, K., Nimerovsky, E., Tekwani Movellan, K., Becker, S., and Andreas, L.:
Backbone Torsion Angle Determination Using Proton Detected Magic-Angle
Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 13, 18–24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03267</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Zerweck et al.(2017)Zerweck, Strandberg, Kukharenko, Reichert,
Buerck, Wadhwani, and Ulrich</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zerweck, J., Strandberg, E., Kukharenko, O., Reichert, J., Buerck, J.,
Wadhwani, P., and Ulrich, A.: Molecular mechanism of synergy between the
antimicrobial peptides PGLa and magainin 2, Sci. Rep., 7, 13153,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12599-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12599-7</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
