Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2025-9
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2025-9
27 Jun 2025
 | 27 Jun 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal MR.

Quantifying the carbon footprint of conference travel: the case of NMR meetings

Lucky N. Kapoor, Natalia Ruzickova, Predrag Živadinović, Valentin Leitner, Maria Anna Sisak, Cecelia Mweka, Jeroen Dobbelaere, Georgios Katsaros, and Paul Schanda

Abstract. Conference travel contributes to the climate footprint of academic research. Here, we provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon emissions associated with conference attendance by analyzing travel data from participants of ten international conferences in the field of magnetic resonance, namely EUROMAR, ENC and ICMRBS. We find that attending a EUROMAR conference produces on average approximately 1 ton CO2eq. For the analysed conferences outside Europe the corresponding value is about 2–3 times higher. We compare these conference-related emissions to other activities associated to research, and show that conference travel is a substantial portion of the total climate footprint of a researcher in magnetic resonance. We explore several strategies to reduce these emissions, including the impact of selecting conference venues more strategically and the possibility of decentralized conferences. Through a detailed comparison of train versus air travel — accounting for both direct and infrastructure-related emissions — we demonstrate that train travel offers considerable carbon savings. This data may provide a basis for strategic choices of future conferences in the field and for individuals deciding on their conference attendance.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Magnetic Resonance.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Lucky N. Kapoor, Natalia Ruzickova, Predrag Živadinović, Valentin Leitner, Maria Anna Sisak, Cecelia Mweka, Jeroen Dobbelaere, Georgios Katsaros, and Paul Schanda

Status: open (until 25 Jul 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on mr-2025-9', Peter Lundberg, 28 Jun 2025 reply
Lucky N. Kapoor, Natalia Ruzickova, Predrag Živadinović, Valentin Leitner, Maria Anna Sisak, Cecelia Mweka, Jeroen Dobbelaere, Georgios Katsaros, and Paul Schanda
Lucky N. Kapoor, Natalia Ruzickova, Predrag Živadinović, Valentin Leitner, Maria Anna Sisak, Cecelia Mweka, Jeroen Dobbelaere, Georgios Katsaros, and Paul Schanda

Viewed

Total article views: 49 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
45 3 1 49 2 0 0
  • HTML: 45
  • PDF: 3
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 49
  • Supplement: 2
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 47 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 47 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
By reviewing attendee lists of ten MR (magnetic resonance) meetings over the last year, we estimate the climate footprint of conferences and explore possibilities to reduce it. This manuscript will facilitate discussions about possible actions the community may take.
Share