the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantifying the carbon footprint of conference travel: the case of NMR meetings
Abstract. Conference travel contributes to the climate footprint of academic research. Here, we provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon emissions associated with conference attendance by analyzing travel data from participants of ten international conferences in the field of magnetic resonance, namely EUROMAR, ENC and ICMRBS. We find that attending a EUROMAR conference produces on average approximately 1 ton CO2eq. For the analysed conferences outside Europe the corresponding value is about 2–3 times higher. We compare these conference-related emissions to other activities associated to research, and show that conference travel is a substantial portion of the total climate footprint of a researcher in magnetic resonance. We explore several strategies to reduce these emissions, including the impact of selecting conference venues more strategically and the possibility of decentralized conferences. Through a detailed comparison of train versus air travel — accounting for both direct and infrastructure-related emissions — we demonstrate that train travel offers considerable carbon savings. This data may provide a basis for strategic choices of future conferences in the field and for individuals deciding on their conference attendance.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Magnetic Resonance.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(2671 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(187 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 25 Jul 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on mr-2025-9', Peter Lundberg, 28 Jun 2025
reply
Great work, many thanks for the efforts. Distributed conferences seems to be the easiest and quickest solution. But how can it be set up most efficiently?
73, Peter
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2025-9-CC1
Supplement
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45 | 3 | 1 | 49 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
- HTML: 45
- PDF: 3
- XML: 1
- Total: 49
- Supplement: 2
- BibTeX: 0
- EndNote: 0
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1