Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-7-53-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Scalable modeling of multi-spin ensembles in SABRE hyperpolarization: a symmetry-based framework for zero and ultralow fields
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 21 May 2026)
- Preprint (discussion started on 24 Feb 2026)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on mr-2026-4', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Mar 2026
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Danil Markelov, 27 Mar 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on mr-2026-4', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Mar 2026
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Danil Markelov, 27 Mar 2026
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Danil Markelov on behalf of the Authors (01 Apr 2026)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (10 Apr 2026) by Malcolm Levitt
AR by Danil Markelov on behalf of the Authors (13 Apr 2026)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (13 Apr 2026) by Malcolm Levitt
AR by Danil Markelov on behalf of the Authors (13 Apr 2026)
Manuscript
The authors of “Scalable Modelling of Multi-Spin Ensembles in SABRE Hyperpolarization: A Symmetry-Based Framework for Zero and Ultralow Field” present an informative guide for highly efficient numerical simulations of spin dynamics in SABRE, employing the pseudo-spin approach for equivalent spins.
The manuscript is carefully prepared and has no obvious errors. However, in its current detailed form, it is not always clear under which conditions the reduction of the Liouville space to a subspace is valid, and more importantly under which circumstances this approximation may break down. Clarifying these limits of applicability would strengthen the work.
Furthermore, the manuscript appears to focus primarily on ZULF NMR, although the authors suggest that the proposed methodology could be applied more broadly. It would therefore be beneficial to elaborate on how this approach could be extended to high-field NMR experiments, where, for example, the equivalence of methyl and methylene groups might also be exploited.
In this context, the authors should also reference prior efforts aimed at simplifying spin dynamics calculations through permutation symmetry. Relevant examples include, but are not limited to, the work of I. Kuprov (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2007.09.014) and S. I. Doronin (https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776111130036).
Finally, a minor point - line 410 appears to be missing an important reference and should be corrected.