Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2020-28
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2020-28
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
01 Dec 2020
01 Dec 2020
Review status: this preprint was under review for the journal MR but the revision was not accepted.
Open Access: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. An Editorial
- Ecole Normale Supérieure-PSL Research University, Département de Chimie, 24 rue Lhomond, F-75005 Paris, France
- Ecole Normale Supérieure-PSL Research University, Département de Chimie, 24 rue Lhomond, F-75005 Paris, France
Abstract. About a year after launching Magnetic Resonance
it seems appropriate to publish a few editorial remarks about the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of Open Access, motivated by an analysis of the Ethics Committee of the French CNRS and by a debate organized by the Royal Dutch Academy of Science.
How to cite. Bodenhausen, G.: Open Access: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. An Editorial, Magn. Reson. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2020-28, 2020.
Download & links
Geoffrey Bodenhausen
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Open Access and Magnetic Resonance', Gottfried Otting, 06 Dec 2020
-
AC1: 'About butterflies, barnacles and stamp collecting', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 07 Dec 2020
-
AC1: 'About butterflies, barnacles and stamp collecting', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 07 Dec 2020
-
RC2: 'my review', Daniella Goldfarb, 08 Dec 2020
-
AC2: 'Hybrid Open Access charges', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 20 Dec 2020
-
AC2: 'Hybrid Open Access charges', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 20 Dec 2020
-
SC1: 'Comments', Nino Wili, 15 Dec 2020
-
AC3: 'Are specialists of bio-NMR like Prometheus ?', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 20 Dec 2020
-
AC3: 'Are specialists of bio-NMR like Prometheus ?', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 20 Dec 2020
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Open Access and Magnetic Resonance', Gottfried Otting, 06 Dec 2020
-
AC1: 'About butterflies, barnacles and stamp collecting', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 07 Dec 2020
-
AC1: 'About butterflies, barnacles and stamp collecting', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 07 Dec 2020
-
RC2: 'my review', Daniella Goldfarb, 08 Dec 2020
-
AC2: 'Hybrid Open Access charges', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 20 Dec 2020
-
AC2: 'Hybrid Open Access charges', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 20 Dec 2020
-
SC1: 'Comments', Nino Wili, 15 Dec 2020
-
AC3: 'Are specialists of bio-NMR like Prometheus ?', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 20 Dec 2020
-
AC3: 'Are specialists of bio-NMR like Prometheus ?', Geoffrey Bodenhausen, 20 Dec 2020
Geoffrey Bodenhausen
Geoffrey Bodenhausen
Viewed
Total article views: 740 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Dec 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 464 | 218 | 58 | 740 | 25 | 27 |
- HTML: 464
- PDF: 218
- XML: 58
- Total: 740
- BibTeX: 25
- EndNote: 27
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 702 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 685 with geography defined
and 17 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Latest update: 21 Oct 2021