Magnetic Resonance
Magnetic Resonance
Magnetic Resonance
Articles | Volume 1, issue 2
Articles | Volume 1, issue 2
Magn. Reson., 1, 285–299, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-285-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Magn. Reson., 1, 285–299, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-285-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 1, issue 2

Research article 09 Dec 2020

Research article | 09 Dec 2020

Strategies to identify and suppress crosstalk signals in double electron–electron resonance (DEER) experiments with gadoliniumIII and nitroxide spin-labeled compounds

Markus Teucher et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 558 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
399 137 22 558 46 17 18
  • HTML: 399
  • PDF: 137
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 558
  • Supplement: 46
  • BibTeX: 17
  • EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 543 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 541 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Feb 2021
Download
Short summary
With a pulsed dipolar electron paramagnetic resonance technique named double electron–electron resonance (DEER), we measure nanometer distances between spin labels attached to biomolecules. If more than one spin type is present (A and B), we can separately address AA, AB, and BB distances via distinct spectroscopic channels, increasing the information content per sample. Here, we investigate the appearance of unwanted channel crosstalks in DEER and suggest ways to identify and suppress them.
Read more