Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-1-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-1-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Intermolecular contributions, filtration effects and signal composition of SIFTER (single-frequency technique for refocusing)
Agathe Vanas
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2,
8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Janne Soetbeer
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2,
8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Frauke Diana Breitgoff
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2,
8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Henrik Hintz
Department of Chemistry, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25,
33615 Bielefeld, Germany
Muhammad Sajid
Department of Chemistry, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25,
33615 Bielefeld, Germany
Yevhen Polyhach
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2,
8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Adelheid Godt
Department of Chemistry, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25,
33615 Bielefeld, Germany
Gunnar Jeschke
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2,
8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Maxim Yulikov
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2,
8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Daniel Klose
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2,
8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Related authors
Nino Wili, Henrik Hintz, Agathe Vanas, Adelheid Godt, and Gunnar Jeschke
Magn. Reson., 1, 75–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-75-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-75-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Measuring distances between unpaired electron spins is an important application of electron paramagnetic resonance. The longest distance that is accessible is limited by the phase memory time of the electron spins. Here we show that strong continuous microwave irradiation can significantly slow down relaxation. Additionally, we introduce a phase-modulation scheme that allows measurement of the distance during the irradiation. Our approach could thus significantly extend the accessible distances.
Sergei Kuzin, Victoriya N. Syryamina, Mian Qi, Moritz Fischer, Miriam Hülsmann, Adelheid Godt, Gunnar Jeschke, and Maxim Yulikov
Magn. Reson. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2024-19, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2024-19, 2024
Preprint under review for MR
Short summary
Short summary
Quantification of heterogeneous systems such as unstructured or semi-structured (bio)macromolecules is an important but challenging task. Pulse EPR methods can contribute by characterizing the local nuclear environment of a spin centre. Here, we provide a detailed assessment of a pulse EPR technique derived from a RIDME experiment. We review the theoretical principles, discuss the data analysis and demonstrate an application to a spin-labeled macromolecule supported by in silico modelling.
Gunnar Jeschke, Nino Wili, Yufei Wu, Sergei Kuzin, Hugo Karas, Henrik Hintz, and Adelheid Godt
Magn. Reson. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2024-17, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2024-17, 2024
Preprint under review for MR
Short summary
Short summary
Electron spins sense their environment via magnetic interactions. An important contribution stems from nuclear spins in their vicinity. They cause loss of coherence and thus reduce resolution of spectra obtained by experiments on electron spins and the efficiency of transferring electron-spin magentization to other nuclear spins. Here we study how protons in trityl radicals contribute to coherence loss. Such coherence loss is slower in the presence of a strong microwave field.
Jörg Wolfgang Anselm Fischer, Julian Stropp, René Tschaggelar, Oliver Oberhänsli, Nicholas Alaniva, Mariko Inoue, Kazushi Mashima, Alexander Benjamin Barnes, Gunnar Jeschke, and Daniel Klose
Magn. Reson., 5, 143–152, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-5-143-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-5-143-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show the design, simulations, and experimental performance of a 35 GHz electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) resonator based on a cylindrical cavity with 3 mm sample access. The design is robust; simple to manufacture and maintain; and, with its elevated Q value, well-suited to sensitive EPR experiments using continuous-wave or low-power pulsed excitation. Thus, we make multi-frequency EPR spectroscopy, a powerful approach to deconvolute overlapping paramagnetic species, more accessible.
Julian Stropp, Nino Wili, Niels Christian Nielsen, and Daniel Klose
Magn. Reson. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2024-14, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2024-14, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for MR
Short summary
Short summary
Sensitivity is often the limiting factor in ENDOR. Here, we demonstrate how using chirp radiofrequency pulses can improve ENDOR sensitivity up to 3-9-fold, with the strongest increase for broader lines often encountered in disordered solids for nuclei such as nitrogen and metals. The resulting drastic speed-up in acquisition times renders also 2D ENDOR more feasible, as we demonstrate in 2D TRIPLE showing correlations of Cu hyperfine couplings.
Nino Wili, Jan Henrik Ardenkjær-Larsen, and Gunnar Jeschke
Magn. Reson., 3, 161–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-3-161-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-3-161-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Dynamic nuclear polarisation (DNP) transfers polarisation from electron to nuclear spins. This is usually combined with direct detection of the latter. Here, we show that it is possible to reverse the transfer at 1.2 T. This allows us to investigate the spin dynamics of nuclear spins close to electrons – something that is notoriously difficult with established methods. We expect reverse DNP to be useful in the study of spin diffusion or as a building block for more elaborate pulse sequences.
Markus Teucher, Mian Qi, Ninive Cati, Henrik Hintz, Adelheid Godt, and Enrica Bordignon
Magn. Reson., 1, 285–299, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-285-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-285-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
With a pulsed dipolar electron paramagnetic resonance technique named double electron–electron resonance (DEER), we measure nanometer distances between spin labels attached to biomolecules. If more than one spin type is present (A and B), we can separately address AA, AB, and BB distances via distinct spectroscopic channels, increasing the information content per sample. Here, we investigate the appearance of unwanted channel crosstalks in DEER and suggest ways to identify and suppress them.
Luis Fábregas Ibáñez, Gunnar Jeschke, and Stefan Stoll
Magn. Reson., 1, 209–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-209-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-209-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Dipolar electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy methods such as DEER provide data on how proteins change shape, thus giving detailed insight into how proteins work. We present DeerLab, a comprehensive open-source software for reliably analyzing the associated data. The software implements a series of theoretical and algorithmic innovations and thereby improves the quality and reproducibility of data analysis.
Nino Wili, Henrik Hintz, Agathe Vanas, Adelheid Godt, and Gunnar Jeschke
Magn. Reson., 1, 75–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-75-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-75-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Measuring distances between unpaired electron spins is an important application of electron paramagnetic resonance. The longest distance that is accessible is limited by the phase memory time of the electron spins. Here we show that strong continuous microwave irradiation can significantly slow down relaxation. Additionally, we introduce a phase-modulation scheme that allows measurement of the distance during the irradiation. Our approach could thus significantly extend the accessible distances.
Related subject area
Field: EPR | Topic: Theory
The effect of the zero-field splitting in light-induced pulsed dipolar electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy
The effect of spin polarization on double electron–electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy
Andreas Scherer, Berk Yildirim, and Malte Drescher
Magn. Reson., 4, 27–46, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-27-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-27-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Light-induced pulsed dipolar EPR spectroscopy (PDS) is an emerging field that uses photoexcited triplet states to determine distance restraints in the nanometer range. To date, light-induced PDS data have been analyzed with methods developed for techniques that do not invoke light-induced triplets. Here, we provide a new theoretical description that takes the full nature of the triplet state into account and demonstrate that it leads to more accurate fits of experimental data.
Sarah R. Sweger, Vasyl P. Denysenkov, Lutz Maibaum, Thomas F. Prisner, and Stefan Stoll
Magn. Reson., 3, 101–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-3-101-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-3-101-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work examines the physics underlying double electron–electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy, a magnetic-resonance method that provides nanoscale data about protein structure and conformations.
Cited articles
Abdullin, D. and Schiemann, O.: Pulsed Dipolar EPR Spectroscopy and Metal
Ions: Methodology and Biological Applications, ChemPlusChem, 85, 353–372,
https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.201900705, 2020. a
Akhmetzyanov, D., Schöps, P., Marko, A., Kunjir, N. C., Sigurdsson, S. T., and
Prisner, T. F.: Pulsed EPR dipolar spectroscopy at Q- and G-band on a trityl
biradical, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 24446–24451,
https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp03671b, 2015. a, b, c
Bahrenberg, T., Jahn, S. M., Feintuch, A., Stoll, S., and Goldfarb, D.: The decay of the refocused Hahn echo in double electron–electron resonance (DEER) experiments, Magn. Reson., 2, 161–173, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2-161-2021, 2021. a, b
Borbat, P. P. and Freed, J. H.: Double-Quantum ESR and Distance Measurements,
in: Distance Measurements in Biological Systems by EPR, edited by: Berliner,
L. J., Eaton, G. R., and Eaton, S. S., 383–459, Springer US, Boston, MA,
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47109-4_9, 2002. a
Borbat, P. P. and Freed, J. H.: Dipolar spectroscopy – single-resonance
methods, eMagRes, 6, 465–494, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1519, 2017. a
Bowen, A. M., Erlenbach, N., van Os, P., Stelzl, L. S., Sigurdsson, S. T., and
Prisner, T. F.: Orientation Selective 2D-SIFTER Experiments at X-Band
Frequencies, Appl. Magn. Res., 49, 1355–1368,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-018-1057-3, 2018. a, b, c
Breitgoff, F. D.: Frequency-swept Excitation in Distance Measurements by EPR,
PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,
https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch:443/handle/20.500.11850/404912 (last access: 10 January 2023),
2019. a
Breton, N. L., Martinho, M., Mileo, E., Etienne, E., Gerbaud, G., Guigliarelli,
B., and Belle, V.: Exploring intrinsically disordered proteins using
site-directed spin labeling electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy,
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 2, 21, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2015.00021, 2015. a
Bretschneider, M., Spindler, P. E., Rogozhnikova, O. Y., Trukhin, D. V.,
Endeward, B., Kuzhelev, A. A., Bagryanskaya, E. G., Tormyshev, V. M., and
Prisner, T. F.: Multiquantum Counting of Trityl Radicals, J. Phys.
Chem. Lett., 11, 6286–6290, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01615, 2020. a
Doll, A., Pribitzer, S., Tschaggelar, R., and Jeschke, G.: Adiabatic and fast
passage ultra-wideband inversion in pulsed EPR, J. Magn.
Reson., 230, 27–39, 2013. a
Fabregas-Ibanez, L., Tessmer, M. H., Jeschke, G., and Stoll, S.: Dipolar
pathways in dipolar EPR spectroscopy, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
24, 2504–2520, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cp03305k, 2022. a
Fleck, N., Heubach, C., Hett, T., Spicher, S., Grimme, S., and Schiemann, O.:
Ox-SLIM: Synthesis of and Site-Specific Labelling with a Highly Hydrophilic
Trityl Spin Label, Chemistry, 27, 5292–5297,
https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202100013, 2021. a
Geue, N., Winpenny, R. E. P., and Barran, P. E.: Structural characterisation
methods for supramolecular chemistry that go beyond crystallography, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 51, 8–27, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01550d, 2022. a
Goldfarb, D.: Exploring protein conformations in vitro and in cell with EPR
distance measurements, Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol., 75, 102398,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102398, 2022. a
Hintz, H., Vanas, A., Klose, D., Jeschke, G., and Godt, A.: Trityl Radicals
with a Combination of the Orthogonal Functional Groups Ethyne and Carboxyl:
Synthesis without a Statistical Step and EPR Characterization, J.
Org. Chem., 84, 3304–3320, 2019. a
Ibáñez, L. F. and Jeschke, G.: Optimal background treatment in
dipolar spectroscopy, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 22, 1855–1868,
https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cp06111h, 2020. a, b
Jarvi, A. G., Bogetti, X., Singewald, K., Ghosh, S., and Saxena, S.: Going the
dHis-tance: Site-Directed Cu2+ Labeling of Proteins and Nucleic Acids,
Accounts Chem. Res., 54, 1481–1491,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00761, 2021. a
Jassoy, J. J., Berndhäuser, A., Duthie, F., Kühn, S. P.,
Hagelueken, G., and Schiemann, O.: Versatile Trityl Spin Labels for
Nanometer Distance Measurements on Biomolecules In Vitro and within Cells,
Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 56, 177–181,
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201609085, 2017. a, b
Jeschke, G.: DEER Distance Measurements on Proteins, Annu. Rev.
Phys. Chem., 63, 419–446,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143716, 2012. a
Jeschke, G.: Dipolar spectroscopy-double-resonance methods, eMagRes, 5,
1459–1476, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1518, 2016. a
Jeschke, G.: The contribution of modern EPR to structural biology, Emerging
Topics in Life Sciences, 2, 9–18, https://doi.org/10.1042/etls20170143, 2018. a, b
Ketter, S., Gopinath, A., Rogozhnikova, O., Trukhin, D., Tormyshev, V. M.,
Bagryanskaya, E. G., and Joseph, B.: In Situ Labeling and Distance
Measurements of Membrane Proteins in E. coli Using Finland and OX063
Trityl Labels, Chemistry, 27, 2299–2304,
https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004606, 2021. a
Krumkacheva, O. A. and Bagryanskaya, E. G.: Trityl radicals as spin labels,
in: SPR – Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Volume 25, edited by: Chechik, V. and Murphy, D. M.,
35–60, The Royal Society of Chemistry, https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782629436-00035,
2016. a
Krumkacheva, O. and Bagryanskaya, E.: EPR-based distance measurements at
ambient temperature, J. Magn. Reson., 280, 117–126,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.02.015, 2017a. a
Krumkacheva, O. A. and Bagryanskaya, E. G.: Trityl radicals as spin labels,
in: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Vol. 25, edited by: Chechik, V. and
Murphy, D. M., chap. Trityl rad, 35–60, The Royal Society of Chemistry,
https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782629436-00035, 2017b. a
Kunjir, N. C., Reginsson, G. W., Schiemann, O., and Sigurdsson, S. T.:
Measurements of short distances between trityl spin labels with CW EPR, DQC
and PELDOR, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 19673–19685,
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp52789a, 2013. a
Martin, R. E., Pannier, M., Diederich, F., Gramlich, V., Hubrich, M., and
Spiess, H. W.: Determination of End-to-End Distances in a Series of TEMPO
Diradicals of up to 2.8 nm Length with a New Four-Pulse Double Electron
Electron Resonance Experiment, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 37,
2833–2837,
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2833::AID-ANIE2833>3.0.CO;2-7,
1998. a
Meyer, A., Jassoy, J. J., Spicher, S., Berndhäuser, A., and Schiemann, O.:
Performance of PELDOR, RIDME, SIFTER, and DQC in measuring distances in
trityl based bi- and triradicals: exchange coupling, pseudosecular coupling
and multi-spin effects, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20,
13858–13869, https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP01276H, 2018. a, b, c
Milov, A. D. and Tsvetkov, Y. D.: Double electron-electron resonance in
electron spin echo: Conformations of spin-labeled poly-4-vinilpyridine in
glassy solutions, Appl. Magn. Reson., 12, 495–504,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164129, 1997. a
Milov, A. D., Salikhov, K. M., and Shchirov, M. D.: Use of the double
resonance in electron spin echo method for the study of paramagnetic center
spatial distribution in solids, Sov. Phys. Solid State, 23, 975–982, 1981. a
Milov, A. D., Ponomarev, A. B., and Tsvetkov, Y. D.: Electron-electron double
resonance in electron spin echo: Model biradical systems and the sensitized
photolysis of decalin, Chem. Phys. Lett., 110, 67–72,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(84)80148-7, 1984. a
Milov, A. D., Maryasov, A. G., and Tsvetkov, Y. D.: Pulsed electron double
resonance (PELDOR) and its applications in free-radicals research, Appl.
Magn. Reson., 15, 107–143, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03161886, 1998. a
Pannier, M., Veit, S., Godt, A., Jeschke, G., and Spiess, H. W.: Dead-Time
Free Measurement of Dipole-Dipole Interactions between Electron Spins,
J. Magn. Reson., 142, 331–340, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1999.1944,
2000. a
Reginsson, G. W., Kunjir, N. C., Sigurdsson, S. T., and Schiemann, O.: Trityl
radicals: Spin labels for nanometer-distance measurements, Chemistry, 18, 13580–13584, https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201203014, 2012. a
Roessler, M. M. and Salvadori, E.: Principles and applications of EPR
spectroscopy in the chemical sciences, Chem. Soc. Rev., 47,
2534–2553, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00565a, 2018. a
Sajid, M., Jeschke, G., Wiebcke, M., and Godt, A.: Conformationally unambiguous
spin labeling for distance measurements, Chemistry, 15,
12960–12962, 2009. a
Salikhov, K. M. and Khairuzhdinov, I. T.: Four-Pulse ELDOR Theory of the
Spin Label Pairs Extended to Overlapping EPR Spectra and to
Overlapping Pump and Observer Excitation Bands, Appl. Magn.
Reson., 46, 67–83, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-014-0609-4, 2015. a
Schiemann, O. and Prisner, T. F.: Long-range distance determinations in
biomacromolecules by EPR spectroscopy, Q. Rev. Biophys., 40,
1–53, https://doi.org/10.1017/s003358350700460x, 2007. a
Schöps, P., Spindler, P. E., Marko, A., and Prisner, T. F.: Broadband
spin echoes and broadband SIFTER in EPR, J. Magn. Reson., 250,
55–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2014.10.017, 2015. a, b
Shevelev, G. Y., Gulyak, E. L., Lomzov, A. A., Kuzhelev, A. A., Krumkacheva,
O. A., Kupryushkin, M. S., Tormyshev, V. M., Fedin, M. V., Bagryanskaya,
E. G., and Pyshnyi, D. V.: A Versatile Approach to Attachment of
Triarylmethyl Labels to DNA for Nanoscale Structural EPR Studies at
Physiological Temperatures, J. Phys. Chem. B, 122, 137–143,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b10689, 2018. a
Soetbeer, J., Fabregas-Ibanez, L., Berkson, Z., Polyhach, Y., and Jeschke, G.:
Regularized dynamical decoupling noise spectroscopy – a decoherence
descriptor for radicals in glassy matrices, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 23, 21664–21676, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cp03103a, 2021a. a
Soetbeer, J., Millen, M., Zouboulis, K., Hülsmann, M., Godt, A., Polyhach,
Y., and Jeschke, G.: Dynamical decoupling in water–glycerol
glasses: a comparison of nitroxides, trityl radicals and gadolinium
complexes, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 23, 5352–5369,
https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cp00055a, 2021b. a
Spindler, P. E., Schöps, P., Kallies, W., Glaser, S. J., and Prisner,
T. F.: Perspectives of shaped pulses for EPR spectroscopy, J.
Magn. Reson., 280, 30–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.02.023, 2017. a, b, c, d
Tormyshev, V. M., Chubarov, A. S., Krumkacheva, O. A., Trukhin, D. V.,
Rogozhnikova, O. Y., Spitsyna, A. S., Kuzhelev, A. A., Koval, V. V., Fedin,
M. V., Godovikova, T. S., Bowman, M. K., and Bagryanskaya, E. G.:
Methanethiosulfonate Derivative of OX063 Trityl: A Promising and Efficient
Reagent for Side-Directed Spin Labeling of Proteins, Chemistry, 26, 2705–2712, https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201904587, 2020.
a
Tschaggelar, R., Breitgoff, F. D., Oberhänsli, O., Qi, M., Godt, A., and
Jeschke, G.: High-Bandwidth Q-Band EPR Resonators, Appl. Magn.
Reson., 48, 1273–1300, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-017-0956-z, 2017. a
Vanas, A., Soetbeer, J., Breitgoff, F. D., Hintz, H., Sajid, M., Polyhach, Y., Godt, A., Jeschke, G., Yulikov, M., and Klose, D.: Code and data: Intermolecular contributions, filtration effects and composition of the SIFTER signal, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7113575, 2022. a
Wili, N., Hintz, H., Vanas, A., Godt, A., and Jeschke, G.: Distance measurement between trityl radicals by pulse dressed electron paramagnetic resonance with phase modulation, Magn. Reson., 1, 75–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-75-2020, 2020. a
Wolfowicz, G. and Morton, J. J.: Pulse Techniques for Quantum Information
Processing, eMagRes, 5, 1515–1528, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1521, 2016. a
Yang, Z., Liu, Y., Borbat, P., Zweier, J. L., Freed, J. H., and Hubbell, W. L.:
Pulsed ESR dipolar spectroscopy for distance measurements in immobilized
spin labeled proteins in liquid solution, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 134, 9950–9952, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja303791p, 2012. a, b
Yang, Z., Bridges, M. D., López, C. J., Rogozhnikova, O. Y., Trukhin,
D. V., Brooks, E. K., Tormyshev, V., Halpern, H. J., and Hubbell, W. L.: A
triarylmethyl spin label for long-range distance measurement at physiological
temperatures using T1 relaxation enhancement, J. Magn. Reson.,
269, 50–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2016.05.006, 2016. a
Short summary
Nanometre distance measurements between spin labels by pulse EPR techniques yield structural information on the molecular level. Here, backed by experimental data, we derive a description for the total signal of the single-frequency technique for refocusing dipolar couplings (SIFTER), showing how the different spin–spin interactions give rise to dipolar signal and background – the latter has thus far been unknown.
Nanometre distance measurements between spin labels by pulse EPR techniques yield structural...