Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-243-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-243-2023
Research article
 | 
01 Nov 2023
Research article |  | 01 Nov 2023

The solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization in liquids – accounting for g-tensor anisotropy at high magnetic fields

Deniz Sezer, Danhua Dai, and Thomas F. Prisner

Related authors

Non-perturbative treatment of the solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization
Deniz Sezer
Magn. Reson., 4, 129–152, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-129-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-129-2023, 2023
Short summary
The solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization in liquids
Deniz Sezer
Magn. Reson., 4, 153–174, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-153-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-153-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Field: Hyperpolarization | Topic: Theory
Non-perturbative treatment of the solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization
Deniz Sezer
Magn. Reson., 4, 129–152, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-129-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-129-2023, 2023
Short summary
The solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization in liquids
Deniz Sezer
Magn. Reson., 4, 153–174, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-153-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-4-153-2023, 2023
Short summary
Extended Bloch–McConnell equations for mechanistic analysis of hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance experiments on enzyme systems
Thomas R. Eykyn, Stuart J. Elliott, and Philip W. Kuchel
Magn. Reson., 2, 421–446, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2-421-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2-421-2021, 2021
Short summary
Hyperpolarization and the physical boundary of Liouville space
Malcolm H. Levitt and Christian Bengs
Magn. Reson., 2, 395–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2-395-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-2-395-2021, 2021
Short summary
Representation of population exchange at level anti-crossings
Bogdan A. Rodin and Konstantin L. Ivanov
Magn. Reson., 1, 347–365, https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-347-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-347-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Abragam, A.: The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, Oxford University Press, New York, ISBN 978 0 19 852014 6, 1961. a, b
Abragam, A. and Goldman, M.: Principles of dynamic nuclear polarisation, Rep. Prog. Phys., 41, 395, https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/41/3/002, 1978. a
Abragam, A. and Proctor, W. G.: Une nouvelle méthode de polarisation dynamique des noyaux atomiques dans les solides, Compt. Rend., 246, 2253–2256, 1958. a, b
Anderson, P. W.: A Mathematical Model for the Narrowing of Spectral Lines by Exchange or Motion, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 9, 316–339, https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.9.316, 1954. a, b
Atsarkin, V. A.: Dynamic nuclear polarization: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 324, 012003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/324/1/012003, 2011. a
Download
Short summary
We recently liberated the solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) from its perturbative treatment by describing the relevant spin dynamics in a time domain. This allows us to easily account for dynamical processes that modulate the spin interactions in liquids, like the translational diffusion of spins. Here we additionally model the slow rotational diffusion of the polarizing agent and analyze DNP data from nitroxide spin labels in lipid bilayers at 9.4 T.